Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: ian wright is a fucking cunt  (Read 4728 times)
DMR

« on: Friday, April 18, 2008, 12:35:09 »

says it all, really

seen he's quit the beeb saying their football coverage is pathetic. that may be so but you're a massive part of that you jumped up hyperactive twat
Logged
neville w

« Reply #1 on: Friday, April 18, 2008, 12:41:03 »

For once DMR, I'm in total agreement !

Seeing as we won't have any England International footy on the Beeb soon, and he's not intellectually capable of dealing with anything (sorry, anyfink) else, it's a typically empty gesture anyway.
Logged
Jamiesfuturewife
Cats is nature

Offline Offline

Posts: 11649





Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Friday, April 18, 2008, 12:46:56 »

Isnt he presenting the new Gladiators?
Logged
neville w

« Reply #3 on: Friday, April 18, 2008, 12:51:37 »

Quote from: "Jamiesfuturewife"
Isnt he presenting the new Gladiators?


I believe so - sums it up really.

So what he really means is  - so long suckers, I've got a better offer
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21305





Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Friday, April 18, 2008, 13:22:54 »

i like ian wright.but i also think the bbc has good match coverage.excusing the woman and pearce of course.
 itv is shit
Logged
magic8ball

« Reply #5 on: Friday, April 18, 2008, 13:38:57 »

Ian Wright Wright Wright.
Logged
Colin Todd

Offline Offline

Posts: 3318




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Friday, April 18, 2008, 13:49:37 »

Ian wright is the drooling retard of football punditry.  His basic analysis of England games consisted of either wanking over his sons performance or telling the nation why his son should be playing in the most inarticulate way imaginable.  Innit bruv

He's a cock.
Logged
oxford_fan

Offline Offline

Posts: 6764





Ignore
« Reply #7 on: Friday, April 18, 2008, 13:56:02 »

ian wright is correct, football coverage needs a shake-up.

ditch the analysis and punditry on match of the day. the presenter is normally that ugly brummie who adds nothing. the pundits, excepting hansen, are piss poor. i don't need football explaining to me when i've just seen the match, so don't bother to try and analyse it.

at the moment the only thing i get out of pundits is a few laughs at their errors/personal quirks/lawrenson "moments".
Logged
Colin Todd

Offline Offline

Posts: 3318




Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Friday, April 18, 2008, 14:02:41 »

Quote from: "oxford_fan"
ian wright is correct, football coverage needs a shake-up.

ditch the analysis and punditry on match of the day. the presenter is normally that ugly brummie who adds nothing. the pundits, excepting hansen, are piss poor. i don't need football explaining to me when i've just seen the match, so don't bother to try and analyse it.

at the moment the only thing i get out of pundits is a few laughs at their errors/personal quirks/lawrenson "moments".


Yes, he is right in that respect, but as stated above he was part of the problem in the 1st place.

It does my head in when pundits / ex players just describe what I've just watched but in slo-mo then pretend the've been insightful

The reason Andy Gray gets more respect than most is that at times he will give a genuine insight into the game from the mind of an ex pro. He'll explain why a player has done something and looks at things a lot deeper than most of the BBC lot - oh he'll be disappointed with that. I fast forward through the pundity on MOTD

And ITV are just a joke.

Pundits either need to tell me something I might not know, or just not bother at all like you say.
Logged
reeves4england

Offline Offline

Posts: 16139


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: Friday, April 18, 2008, 14:21:29 »

Agree about ITV. Robbie Earle FFS?!!
Logged
Barry Scott

Offline Offline

Posts: 9135




« Reply #10 on: Friday, April 18, 2008, 14:48:43 »

I like Wrighty and i enjoy the pointlessness of his punditry.

Only had Sky a few months, but thought i'd mention it while Colin Todd bought it up, but i find Andy Gray gets on my tits like no other.
Logged
A Gent Orange

Offline Offline

Posts: 1614



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #11 on: Friday, April 18, 2008, 15:06:34 »

Quote from: "Barry Scott"
I like Wrighty and i enjoy the pointlessness of his punditry.


Yeah ITV might as well go the whole hog and follow Channel 5 by getting in Laura Esposito. At least Wright can speak English. Kind of. innit.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2139/2184929389_ed86fc8428.jpg
Logged
Bennett
No Comment

Offline Offline

Posts: 9760





Ignore
« Reply #12 on: Saturday, April 19, 2008, 10:35:22 »

tee hee boobies

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/1908_channel5.shtml
Logged

This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #13 on: Saturday, April 19, 2008, 19:07:24 »

Quote from: "oxford_fan"
ian wright is correct, football coverage needs a shake-up.

He may well be, but five minutes of listening to the drivel he and whatsisface come up with on talkSport is enough to convince anyone who knows what the term lobotomy means though education rather than personal experience that he has no idea how to provide it. And is in no real place to be criticising the punditry of others.
Logged
Panda Paws

Offline Offline

Posts: 2170

Arse




Ignore
« Reply #14 on: Saturday, April 19, 2008, 19:26:08 »

Quote from: "Colin Todd"

The reason Andy Gray gets more respect than most is that at times he will give a genuine insight into the game from the mind of an ex pro. He'll explain why a player has done something and looks at things a lot deeper than most of the BBC lot - oh he'll be disappointed with that. I fast forward through the pundity on MOTD


errrr ... what are Hanson/Lawro/Lineker doing if they're not giving "genuine insight ... from the mind of an ex pro"?

What a bizarre contradictory comment.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
Print
Jump to: