Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: 100 million pound mosque  (Read 3780 times)
STFC Jeffrey

« on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 10:37:59 »

using tax payers money... vote against it: http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/poll/poll-18791-details/ques-18669-id/%C2%A3100m+mosque%3A+Vote+now/poll.do
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 10:40:57 »

I voted yes.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 10:43:32 »

If  Jeffrey is against it, then it must be a good idea.
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 10:46:07 »

I don't think Jeffrey has read the article which goes with the vote.
Logged
mexico red

Offline Offline

Posts: 11771


Demasiado no es demasiado




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 10:51:53 »

is that cunt still not banned. fuck off.
Logged
ron dodgers

Offline Offline

Posts: 2626


shaddap your face




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 12:04:27 »

will they give us some million squids if we put a mosque in the rebuilt Al-Jezeera County Ground - that'd be an extra 10,000 supporters on STFC for Allah day
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 13:18:58 »

Quote from: "ron dodgers"
will they give us some million squids if we put a mosque in the rebuilt Al-Jezeera County Ground - that'd be an extra 10,000 supporters on STFC for Allah day


 I've previously advocated a purpose built mosque in the redeveloped CG, it would help SBC square the community issue with local residents, sponsorship money could be broought in from Saudi Arabia, Iran and Afghanistan and as the Muslim holy day is Friday wouldn't get in the way of match day.
Logged
Lumps

« Reply #7 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 13:20:44 »

There is NOTHING in that article that even hints that this development would be funded from public money you cretin. In fact it clearly states that it's to be built by the Muslim sect, Tablighi Jamaat. The only controversy is that planning position is to be awarded not by the elected local council, but by the development body put in place for the area covered by the olympic site. I wonder if that would be controversial enough for an outraged headline if it was a big Anglican church being built.

Do you read the Daily Mail by any chance?
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #8 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 14:02:07 »

Quote from: "Lumps"
There is NOTHING in that article that even hints that this development would be funded from public money you cretin. In fact it clearly states that it's to be built by the Muslim sect, Tablighi Jamaat. The only controversy is that planning position is to be awarded not by the elected local council, but by the development body put in place for the area covered by the olympic site. I wonder if that would be controversial enough for an outraged headline if it was a big Anglican church being built.

Do you read the Daily Mail by any chance?


That's what I was hinting at when I said about reading the article. Shocking how easy it is to play on peoples prejudices to get them to have negative opinions on something they are so clearly misinformed on.
Logged
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE

Offline Offline

Posts: 15736





Ignore
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 14:07:37 »

Quote from: "STFC Jeffrey"


I am all for free speech and letting people voice their opinions on open forums like these,

but this guy really is a fucking cock isn't he
Logged
Boeta

Offline Offline

Posts: 3887





Ignore
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 15:03:57 »

absolute bargain, i'll take three
Logged
lebowski

« Reply #11 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 17:51:21 »

anyone else spot the "turn on the power" advert on that site?
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36319




« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 18:08:58 »

I'm more concerned about who is building the Mosque, rtather than the actual Mosque itself, which I don't really have an opinion on
Logged
millom red

Offline Offline

Posts: 1588




Ignore
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 19:44:27 »

George Wimpey or Halliburton will get the contract.
Logged

f it dont need fixing....dont fuckin break it

Await The Day
ronnie21

Offline Offline

Posts: 6146

The Mighty Hankerton




Ignore
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 19:58:22 »

Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
Quote from: "STFC Jeffrey"


I am all for free speech and letting people voice their opinions on open forums like these,

but this guy really is a fucking cock isn't he
Correct :roll:
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
Print
Jump to: