Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Pook  (Read 7600 times)
hansgruber

Offline Offline

Posts: 1606




Ignore
« on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 17:21:53 »

Apparently young Mr Pook is our most improved player of the year, according to the poll on thisisstfc. Does that mean he's miles less shit than he was?
Logged
Bushey Boy

Offline Offline

Posts: 8351





Ignore
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 17:23:33 »

oh fuck off! has to be ifil?
Logged

hansgruber

Offline Offline

Posts: 1606




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 17:23:54 »

That's what I'd have thought
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 32392


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 17:26:21 »

Hmmm maybe it is Pook

While Ifil is much improved on last season, we've seen Ifil play quality before when we had him on loan in our play off season.

Ifil wasnt shit last year, he just under performed

Pook was total gash last season and had 0 stand out games, this season he's had quite a few decent performances are 1 or 2 really good performances.
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 17:31:29 »

ifil for me.he was absolutely awful last season,his improvement this term has been brilliant.

pook struggled badly too last season,he has improved a great deal aswell,but ifil just shades it imo
Logged
Hexagon

Offline Offline

Posts: 421




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 17:51:00 »

When i voted on that Jack smith was winning by quite a bit.
Maybe someone has been doing a bit of voting for Pook.....
Logged
stfc_steve

Offline Offline

Posts: 465





Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 19:00:20 »

Yes ifil has been good this season but you have to look at how pook has improved this last year and a bit.
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36319




« Reply #7 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 20:02:15 »

I firmly believe Ifil has helped us win games. Pook hasn't been as influential.
Logged
swindon-chap

Offline Offline

Posts: 542


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 20:37:24 »

Ifil makes much more of a contribution than Pook. Against Boston i would rather see Weston and Timlin in the midfield.
Logged
mattboyslim

« Reply #9 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 20:39:01 »

Quote from: "swindon-chap"
Ifil makes much more of a contribution than Pook. Against Boston i would rather see Weston and Timlin in the midfield.


Seconded!
Logged
glos_robin

« Reply #10 on: Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 21:15:33 »

Quote from: "mattboyslim"
Quote from: "swindon-chap"
Ifil makes much more of a contribution than Pook. Against Boston i would rather see Weston and Timlin in the midfield.


Seconded!


I agree as well
Logged
Matchworn Shirts
For Sale

Offline Offline

Posts: 7091




Ignore
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 10:04:36 »

He always gets stick but I don't think Pook is a bad player, not the worst we have
Logged

I come from a land down-under
my-velocity

« Reply #12 on: Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 11:42:44 »

Pooks 21 and still shite, should just get rid of him and get someone who can actually play football.
Logged
herthab
TEF Travel

Offline Offline

Posts: 12020





Ignore
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 11:49:29 »

Quote from: "stfcbeckett"
Pooks 21 and still shite, should just get rid of him and get someone who can actually play football.


Thought he did ok against Wrexham.

He's not in the same class as Weston or Timlin, but shite?

Nope.
Logged

It's All Good..............
Rich Pullen

« Reply #14 on: Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 12:02:01 »

Pook is the new "Duke" as he can't do anything ---- I don't rate him that highly on the basis from what I've seen but he's not the worst STFC player I've seen by far.

The biggest shame of it all is that he's a product of the Youth set-up.

What I do believe is that if was truly that bad Sturrock wouldn't have him at the club - like what happened with Onibuje.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
Print
Jump to: