Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Mike Diamandis  (Read 24069 times)
Spencer_White

« Reply #75 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 12:00:49 »

To my mind anything that hastens the greeks downfall can only be good for the club.
Logged
Panda Paws

Offline Offline

Posts: 2170

Arse




Ignore
« Reply #76 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 12:16:18 »

Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"
Its Friday.....I feel a statement coming on \ Cheesy /


Surely only a matter of time, Reg. If it doesn't show up by 5pm I'll make one up myself on their behalf.
Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27137





Ignore
« Reply #77 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 12:18:46 »

I've been doing a bit of digging around Alan's point about 'Fit and Proper Persons'.

In his recent article in the adver Diamandis said:

Quote from: "Mike Diamandis"
My role at the club is where any board-type decisions are made by all the members of the board I would attend with everybody else.

Other than that, if anything else happens which is unusual I would be involved in that process - whatever that is.

That would range from the replacement of Dennis Wise, the leaving of Dennis etc


Football League regs class a director as

Quote

“Director” means in respect of any Club, any individual person operating the powers that are usually associated with the powers of a director of a company incorporated under the Companies Act (as a company limited by shares or by guarantee) including, but not limited to:
(a) a person exercising direct or indirect control over a corporate director of the Club;
(b) a person registered as a director or secretary of the Club with the Registrar of Companies;
(c) a person for whom a Form 288(a) (to be filed with the Registrar of Companies) has been completed in relation to the Club;
(d) a person who has been elected to become a director of the Club at a meeting of the board of directors of the Club;
(e) a person who has been elected to become a director of the Club at a meeting of the members of the Club;
(f) a person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the persons constituting the management of the Club are accustomed to act; or
(g) a person who exercises or is able to exercise direct or indirect control over the affairs of the Club.



Points (a),(f) and (g) are rather interesting. There would seem to be a slight loophole in the regulations for point (a):

Quote

There shall be excluded from the definition of Director any legal or professional advisers acting in their legal or professional capacity without any interest (in excess of a 5% shareholding) in the Club other than as its advisers.


But surely Diamandis can't be classed as a professional advisor because his main occupation is MD of Dunwoody.

As to the possible penalties:

Quote

3.3 Submission of False Information on Declaration
3.3.1 Any Club or Director that negligently, recklessly or with intent provides to The Association a Declaration that proves to be false shall be deemed to have committed an act of misconduct under the rules of The Association.
3.3.2 The Association shall have the power to prescribe fixed fines against a Club in respect of any such event, as per Schedule 4 to these regulations.
3.3.3 Any individual found to have negligently, recklessly or with intent completed false information on the Declaration will be banned from participating as a Director for one year after any Disqualifying Conditions to which they are subject have ceased to apply.
3.3.4 There shall be no appeal against any such penalties.

4. Suspension of League Membership
Where: -
4.1.1 any individual at a Club qualifies as a Director in breach of any of paragraphs 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3, and that Club fails to remove that Director within 28 days of being instructed so to do by The Association (as per paragraph 3.2.4)
or
4.1.2 a Club is deemed to have persistently failed to comply with paragraph 3.1.1 and/or
3.1.2, as described in paragraph 3.1.5 above then The Association may issue The Notice to the league of which the Club is a
member.
4.2 There shall be no appeal by a Club against the serving of The Notice.
4.3 The suspension of the membership may be removed subject to the Association receiving satisfaction on the matter that caused it to be required.
Logged
Maverick

Offline Offline

Posts: 444




Ignore
« Reply #78 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 12:41:26 »

Sam .. not sure from what you post (as some bits referred to in the regulations are not posted) ... but does that mean for the club to be suspended from the league .... the association firstly have to ask the club to remove him as a director, and then wait 28 days to allow them to comply?  If so, then my guess would be that this has not happened ... and once it does we have time to comply.

I would think that they will not ask for that until something has been proved against MikeD (which may never happen as he may not be in breach of anything) ... and the club would be unlikely to pay any penalty as long as nobody can prove that they did anything knowing it to be in breach.

Don't know ... just surmising.
Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27137





Ignore
« Reply #79 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 12:48:24 »

It's taken from the latest FA Handbook. I'd say your understanding is correct, I wasn't implying the club will be penalised - just that that's the worst case scenario.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #80 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 12:58:56 »

Quote from: "Maverick"
Sam .. not sure from what you post (as some bits referred to in the regulations are not posted) ... but does that mean for the club to be suspended from the league .... the association firstly have to ask the club to remove him as a director, and then wait 28 days to allow them to comply?  If so, then my guess would be that this has not happened ... and once it does we have time to comply.

I would think that they will not ask for that until something has been proved against MikeD (which may never happen as he may not be in breach of anything) ... and the club would be unlikely to pay any penalty as long as nobody can prove that they did anything knowing it to be in breach.

Don't know ... just surmising.


 Wahey... Maverick is back  Maverick is back....among the beastly posters on  TEF who say horrid things about Michael.   Things must be serious.
Logged
Maverick

Offline Offline

Posts: 444




Ignore
« Reply #81 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 13:03:02 »

Hi Reg ... glad to see you missed me ..... you should have sent me a private message .. I would have been back sooner!!!!  Cheesy  Tongue
Logged
Dazzza

Offline Offline

Posts: 8265



WWW
« Reply #82 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 13:23:20 »

What struck me following the BBC and Adver articles was that Michael Diamandis has potentially declared that he was in breach or close to breaking the regulations governing banned company directors before the injunction ended.

If he is indeed under investigation I wonder if this will be picked up on or if the FA regs above would be enforced upon historical breaches of the rules.
Logged

Maverick

Offline Offline

Posts: 444




Ignore
« Reply #83 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 13:58:09 »

I am fairly sure that if there has been a historical breach of their rules then we would still be asked to remove him
Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27137





Ignore
« Reply #84 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 16:41:32 »

Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"
Its Friday.....I feel a statement coming on \ Cheesy /


16:40, going by previous there should be a statement in 20 minutes \ Cheesy /
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #85 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 16:44:43 »

:tea:
Logged
mexico red

Offline Offline

Posts: 11758


Demasiado no es demasiado




Ignore
« Reply #86 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 16:50:20 »

i have come online specially for a statement
Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27137





Ignore
« Reply #87 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 16:52:46 »

I have a feeling there's not going to be a statement
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #88 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 16:55:17 »

Crying
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #89 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 17:03:35 »

fucking shit board.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9   Go Up
Print
Jump to: