|
sonic youth
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Sunday, September 10, 2006, 11:07:21 » |
|
i don't see why shakes should be dropped, although his crossing is well below par he adds more to the team in terms of movement, pace and he defends well and covers the fullback.
there's not really any other option, but he does need some competition at that position.
weston's been disappointing given his pre-season performances, but there's definitely great potential there.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
magnum150
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Sunday, September 10, 2006, 12:16:18 » |
|
Brownlie for Shakes should he be dropped
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Sunday, September 10, 2006, 13:26:09 » |
|
Shakes was shited yesterday but Weston was even worse I thought. Don't rate him at all, frankly. I've never seen a player so scared of a tackle.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Sunday, September 10, 2006, 14:01:01 » |
|
Weston looked superb pre-season. In competetive games he hasn't looked as impressive, and yesterday at times reminded me of a poor mans Pook :?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonStevo
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 12:54:47 » |
|
looks like me and OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR were right then.   :ha: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 14:55:56 » |
|
i thought weston offered less last night than shakes does.
weston cut inside so much that he never got into a crossing position, whilst shakes might waste his crosses at least he puts a few in.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonStevo
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 14:58:15 » |
|
ir probably did restrict us with our width alittle bit in truth but i just think it had to be tried and is there as an option. im sure it will work better against certain teams.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
 Offline
Posts: 32436
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 21:00:50 » |
|
we didnt use the wings at all last night. I dont know if that was the plan, pack the middle...but very rarely did Caton or Weston get down the byline
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
santini
Offline
Posts: 890
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 22:16:34 » |
|
we didnt use the wings at all last night. I dont know if that was the plan, pack the middle...but very rarely did Caton or Weston get down the byline Touchline? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32436
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 22:24:01 » |
|
there is a byline though, isnt there?!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BB12
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 22:26:41 » |
|
we didnt use the wings at all last night. I dont know if that was the plan, pack the middle...but very rarely did Caton or Weston get down the byline Touchline? The touchline is where they take the throw-ins, the byline is an extension of the goal line. :smile1: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Doore
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Thursday, September 14, 2006, 09:54:54 » |
|
I think it was Wisey's plan to play narrow, as they were a strong, competitive team through the middle, and we lined up to match them. Hence Weston over Shakes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Thursday, September 14, 2006, 14:29:09 » |
|
probably be the same midfield saturday with shakes at right back if smith is not fit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
