Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
 Offline
Posts: 16354
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: Thursday, September 8, 2011, 20:06:32 » |
|
If DeVita and Kerrouche are the two starting up front I would seriously consider using Connell as a centre back.quite often centre forwards make good centre backs and vice versa. He comes back to defend set pieces and corners anyway and centre forwards are usually tactically more aware in the penalty box than midfielders. He could be pushed up front later in the game if need be and Risser could come on to cover at the back.
I know we're all allowed opinions and stuff. but not you. not after this. Connell at CB would be dreadful |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
|
stfcinbmth
|
|
« Reply #61 on: Thursday, September 8, 2011, 20:19:22 » |
|
Connell should be starting up front, surely there's no doubt about this?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
skin_im_buzzer
Offline
Posts: 160
|
|
« Reply #62 on: Thursday, September 8, 2011, 20:22:34 » |
|
If DeVita and Kerrouche are the two starting up front I would seriously consider using Connell as a centre back.quite often centre forwards make good centre backs and vice versa. He comes back to defend set pieces and corners anyway and centre forwards are usually tactically more aware in the penalty box than midfielders. He could be pushed up front later in the game if need be and Risser could come on to cover at the back.
Please tell me that you're  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Notts red
Offline
Posts: 3146
|
|
« Reply #63 on: Thursday, September 8, 2011, 20:24:52 » |
|
Your right, Connell should be starting up front but I'm not going to put any money on it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Langers
Offline
Posts: 4240
|
|
« Reply #64 on: Thursday, September 8, 2011, 20:30:42 » |
|
Phil Smith at centre back.
At least then we would have someone to blame. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Coca Fola
|
|
« Reply #65 on: Thursday, September 8, 2011, 20:34:08 » |
|
I'll blame him even if he's not playing. Don't worry.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ibelieveinmrreeves
Should've gone to Specsavers
Offline
Posts: 3857
|
|
« Reply #66 on: Thursday, September 8, 2011, 20:38:26 » |
|
Perhaps young Oaley's going to get blooded. He's supposed to be massive, albeit a few inches shorter than flint.
Maybe it's because I'm tired, but just cannot work this out. Oaley? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Even men with steel hearts love to see a dog on the pitch.
|
|
|
|
Coca Fola
|
|
« Reply #67 on: Thursday, September 8, 2011, 20:40:18 » |
|
Think he means that Oakley chap.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ibelieveinmrreeves
Should've gone to Specsavers
Offline
Posts: 3857
|
|
« Reply #68 on: Thursday, September 8, 2011, 20:47:11 » |
|
Youth teamer? Sort of rings a bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Even men with steel hearts love to see a dog on the pitch.
|
|
|
|
Coca Fola
|
|
« Reply #69 on: Thursday, September 8, 2011, 21:37:14 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Notts red
Offline
Posts: 3146
|
|
« Reply #70 on: Thursday, September 8, 2011, 21:38:46 » |
|
Great name too,
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
