Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 [10]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: In defence of Vic  (Read 13105 times)
Lumps

« Reply #135 on: Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 11:05:01 »

See the point but in both of those examples, I'd also be fairly alarmed if the airline or hospital allowed enthusiastic amateurs to stand in as co-pilot or anaesthetist as per the radio co-commentary.

FWIW, I thought the commentary was fine last night if a little flat, but I suspect that's more due to the game than the commentator. But I still prefer Vic. And I still prefer Ed over any of them

I wasn't really refering to the radio commentary, I didn't even hear it, but just refuting the argument that "those that can't do better can't criticise" which as FB pointed out is a bag of shite.
Logged
Langers

Offline Offline

Posts: 4240




Ignore
« Reply #136 on: Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 13:59:52 »

Despite him being a little dour, i though Lucas was really funnly last night.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 [10]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: