Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: This is the reason Peacock was signed  (Read 1829 times)
Reeves for King

Offline Offline

Posts: 751




Ignore
« on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:47:46 »

As Fallon's replacement.

Looks like a fairly good deal as well.
Logged

here's the man himself when you need him?
Piemonte

« Reply #1 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 19:01:02 »

:shock:  :-))(
Logged
Spencer_White

« Reply #2 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 19:05:43 »

Incisive.

Do you work for the Sunday People?
Logged
sonicyouth

Offline Offline

Posts: 22352





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 19:27:37 »

mark devlin said on the radio earlier that fallon only decided he wanted to go at the start of this week, after peacock signed. i suppose peacock may have been signed as a long-term replacement for fallon but certainly not an immediate one.
Logged
Spud

« Reply #4 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 19:33:25 »

Quote from: "sonicyouth"
mark devlin said on the radio earlier that fallon only decided he wanted to go at the start of this week, after peacock signed. i suppose peacock may have been signed as a long-term replacement for fallon but certainly not an immediate one.


He didnt want to be upstaged. :roll:
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: