RobertT
 Offline
Posts: 12317
|
 |
« Reply #105 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:44:29 » |
|
or what if he got injured etc.
Plus, and I might be talking from my rear end, hasn't Peacock got a better goals to game ratio than Fallon? I'm sure he has.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #106 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:44:39 » |
|
I just think Fallons form this season was too good to last. Plus the fact that his attitude was becomming more aloof and his drinking much more noticeable.
I wouldnt have said this had he still been a Town player. But before christmas my mates were in Reflex having a drink. They go up to Fallon to say well done this season and that and Fallon just blanks them (despite not being talking to anyone else). Heywood had a go at Fallon, he apologised and had a word with mates. Fallon was fucked that night. Two days later (saturday) Fallon misses game with the 'flu'.
Peacock is a cut above Fallon. Always has been always will be. Curo is a gamble, but one well worth taking.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57751
|
|
« Reply #107 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:45:30 » |
|
Stop making excuses if you have to gamble then you gamble on staying up with rather than going down without surely?
No if you are gambling with the clubs future. This is of course speculation. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #108 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:45:31 » |
|
WE WILL STAY UP!
THINK POSITIVE, ALL THE NEGATIVE TALK IS REALLY PISSING ME OFF AND I'VE HAD ENOUGH :x
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #109 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:47:30 » |
|
Yes, he is replaceable by Peacock who is Big, Strong and has been a steady goalscorer at league 1 level for years.
Rory scored goals but was'nt prolific was he
Dont start going all VD on us Yeovil :x Your living in a dream world and im sorry if im getting VD(  ) but this has really got my back up and you short sighted settle for the money twats are just making it worse.Years of crap might have worn you down but it hasnt me. Time will tell but as far as Im concerned were down now.Obviously I hope Im wrong and your right though.(Sorry Whits Ive left the positive club) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #110 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:49:05 » |
|
Stop making excuses if you have to gamble then you gamble on staying up with rather than going down without surely?
No if you are gambling with the clubs future. This is of course speculation. Because of course going down will help the clubs future no end. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
Reeves for King
Offline
Posts: 751
|
|
« Reply #111 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:50:06 » |
|
Yes, he is replaceable by Peacock who is Big, Strong and has been a steady goalscorer at league 1 level for years.
Rory scored goals but was'nt prolific was he
Dont start going all VD on us Yeovil :x Your living in a dream world and im sorry if im getting VD( ) but this has really got my back up and you short sighted settle for the money twats are just making it worse.Years of crap might have worn you down but it hasnt me. Time will tell but as far as Im concerned were down now.Obviously I hope Im wrong and your right though.(Sorry Whits Ive left the positive club) Bollocks. We're getting promotion  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
here's the man himself when you need him?
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #112 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:51:50 » |
|
Peacock will do the business. Just a better footballer than Fallon all round.
We will get the goals. DONT PANIC MISTER MANNERING!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #113 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:54:10 » |
|
Ive had enough of this crap im going for a beer.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #114 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:54:19 » |
|
Plus, and I might be talking from my rear end, hasn't Peacock got a better goals to game ratio than Fallon? I'm sure he has. Fallon has 14 goals in twenty-something games. Peacock has 1 in 30 minutes. I make that a hat-trick per-game ratio |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #115 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:55:13 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #116 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:55:19 » |
|
Im actually suprised how pissed off I am,its most unlike me.I wonder if it might in part be due to giving up smoking |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #117 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:55:56 » |
|
Im actually suprised how pissed off I am,its most unlike me.I wonder if it might in part be due to giving up smoking Go get drunk, that'll help |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57751
|
|
« Reply #118 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:57:03 » |
|
Stop making excuses if you have to gamble then you gamble on staying up with rather than going down without surely?
No if you are gambling with the clubs future. This is of course speculation. Because of course going down will help the clubs future no end. From a pure football point of view, keep Fallon (end of) to maximise our chances. I agree. Speculation: But let me put it this way. What IF: 1. Selling Fallon means there will be a club next season whatever, relegation or not. 2. Keeping Fallon may result in the club going under because relagation means a shortfall in cash which can not be bridged by the Fallon fee (because he walks for free). I wouldn't be suprised if the club was on the financial edge where 200K could make a real difference. They can not gamble with our fututre. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reeves for King
Offline
Posts: 751
|
|
« Reply #119 on: Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 18:57:18 » |
|
Why have you given up smoking? Have you started putting more emphasis on drinking? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
here's the man himself when you need him?
|
|
|
|
