sonicyouth
 Offline
Posts: 22352
|
 |
« on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 10:49:40 » |
|
As far as I'm aware everyone is fit, we have no suspensions and the signing of Peacock seems imminent, we've got the entire squad to choose from.
Evans
Gurney Ifil O'Hanlon Nicholas
Shakes Migs Smith Brown
Cureton Peacock
subs: Bulman Smith Nicolau Holgate Fallon |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jim
Offline
Posts: 758
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 10:51:27 » |
|
As far as I'm aware everyone is fit, we have no suspensions and the signing of Peacock seems imminent, we've got the entire squad to choose from.
Evans
Gurney Ifil O'Hanlon Nicholas
Shakes Migs Smith Brown
Cureton Peacock
subs: Bulman Smith Nicolau Holgate Fallon Doubt you'll see O'Hanlon |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 10:52:10 » |
|
Seems ok. I'd like Gurns back at full-back, as Jenks has been a bit suspect.
Did Holgate used to be a right winger at any point in his career?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 10:54:56 » |
|
Oh yeah, good point. Replace Seano with Charlie then.
I've never seen Holgate play out wide but I'm sure he has done.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 10:58:31 » |
|
Comyn Platt in for Sean, get Jamie "frodo" Cureton out and play Fallon and Peacock up from assuming he signs.
"LETS PLAY HOOFBALL"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 11:07:47 » |
|
Peacock hasn't played for a few weeks so I think he'll be on the bench. (if he signs)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 11:09:00 » |
|
Peacock hasn't played for a few weeks so I think he'll be on the bench. (if he signs) Thats probably a fair point. I just dont like Cureton |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
 Online
Posts: 33879
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 11:12:57 » |
|
As far as I know Holgate has never been a right winger in real life only in CM/FM!!
Evans
Lapham (wb)
Gurney
Ifil
CCP
Nicholas (wb)
Miglioranzi
Smith
Brown
Peacock (if he signs)
Holgate
Subs
Bulman
Jenkins
Pook
Fallon
Cureton
I dont believe our wingers have enough quality for a 4-4-2 and most of the time our full backs (esp Nicho) look much more dangerous going forward.
I'd get Ifil to man mark James Hayter who always scores against us
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 11:14:54 » |
|
Ah, thats the ticket. Well done, VD.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 11:27:52 » |
|
the selection of Lapham and Holgate in that side is non-sensical for a must win game.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Online
Posts: 33879
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 11:30:00 » |
|
the selection of Lapham and Holgate in that side is non-sensical for a must win game. why not? at least they would want it, unlike the players I have dropped Fallon & Curetons mind are both else where and they have been poor recently. Shakes is terrible. Holgate is a damn good player, can use his feet well and can pass the ball. He changed the game at Chesterfield Lapham has always looked good, and Jenks gets older, slower and worse as each game goes by.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57751
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 11:30:50 » |
|
And Fallon, sub??? I don't think so.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Online
Posts: 33879
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 11:38:18 » |
|
And Fallon, sub??? I don't think so. Few reason 1. He is really off form and doesnt look committed 2. I think he thinks (or knows) he will be the first name of the team sheet no matter how poor he was previous game 3. His mind is clearly away from STFC right now 4. Bournemouth have probably identified him as the dangerman and are making extra preperation to mark him out the game, because if he doesnt score we dont score therefore we dont win. 5. Changing this would hopefully fool them. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 11:38:35 » |
|
And Fallon, sub??? I don't think so. indeed. He looks like he might stitch us up with the contract, but he's still our no 1 striker and needs to play regardless. His form has dipped of late but I dont think its been bad enough to require dropping
why not? at least they would want it, unlike the players I have dropped
Fallon & Curetons mind are both else where and they have been poor recently.
Shakes is terrible.
Holgate is a damn good player, can use his feet well and can pass the ball. He changed the game at Chesterfield
Lapham has always looked good, and Jenks gets older, slower and worse as each game goes by....
Shakes has shown signs of improvement of late. Holgate looks a decent player, but if we have 3 fit senior strikers then he should be on the bench. The inclussion of Lapham is just fucking random. "here, VD says have a start - on you go lad" I agree that cureton is a usless hobbit though |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Thursday, January 19, 2006, 11:40:30 » |
|
And Fallon, sub??? I don't think so. Few reason 4. Bournemouth have probably identified him as the dangerman and are making extra preperation to mark him out the game, because if he doesnt score we dont score therefore we dont win. 5. Changing this would hopefully fool them.  Yes, lets con them by not playing our most dangerous striker and replacing him with a talented but physically weak 19 year old. What a fucking plan that is :roll: Any other genius plans? like drop Evans who they will have recognised to be a good keeper and play a 15yr old in the hope that Hayter gets complacent? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
