|
Sussex
|
 |
« on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 11:36:48 » |
|
Keeping Colchester's Rory Fallon' off the scoresheet would go a long way to achieving that aim. ?  :| Am I just a bit hungover and being a bit thick? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
 Offline
Posts: 32433
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 11:39:25 » |
|
If Colchesters Rory Fallon is anything like ours, then we dont have much to worry about  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 11:40:44 » |
|
:| Just goes to show which forum actually knows what their talking about when it comes to football!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32433
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 11:41:58 » |
|
when he said Colchesters Rory Fallon, he meant their 'version' of Rory Fallon, ie that big fat lad who will be physical Iweullmoneoenoeneo
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32433
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 11:42:39 » |
|
see...
"I suppose he's their version of Rory' if you like and I'm sure he'll be trying to make life as uncomfortable as possible for Sean and Jerel, to try and rough them up a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 11:43:52 » |
|
when he said Colchesters Rory Fallon, he meant their 'version' of Rory Fallon, ie that big fat lad who will be physical Iweullmoneoenoeneo Ohhhhhhh.......... to be fair Sussex's post didn't really refelct that! And I still think this forum is better  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 11:45:05 » |
|
I'm just thick then, thanks for that  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 11:46:14 » |
|
Cunt  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jim
Offline
Posts: 758
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 11:53:11 » |
|
I'm just thick then, thanks for that 3.5k Christmas bonus - for what? Must be sexual favours :shock: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 12:11:05 » |
|
I'm just thick then, thanks for that 3.5k Christmas bonus - for what? Must be sexual favours :shock: For redesigning a magazine that won business magazine of the year 2005, beating off the likes of Nursing Times, Architecture Today etc.. I'm crap at everything bar my job mind! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
walrus
Offline
Posts: 4228
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 19:04:52 » |
|
I'm just thick then, thanks for that 3.5k Christmas bonus - for what? Must be sexual favours :shock: For redesigning a magazine that won business magazine of the year 2005, beating off the likes of Nursing Times, Architecture Today etc.. I'm crap at everything bar my job mind! What? Those great titles? I was gutted not to get a yearly subscription to them both for Xmas.... :| |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 19:24:27 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 19:37:47 » |
|
Kiss the hand, cunt. (That's for Walrus, not you Johno ) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16005
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 20:27:32 » |
|
Im sure Johno wouldn't complain...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Monday, December 26, 2005, 20:37:28 » |
|
thought i was getting something then. only cause walrus is a pretty boy isn't it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
