McLovin
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 11:50:35 » |
|
Fraser McHugh ran round loads. He wasn't that good though was he?
Migz needs to get up to speed. He doesn't have as much time as he thinks he does.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Online
Posts: 33875
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 11:51:52 » |
|
Fraser McHugh ran round loads. He wasn't that good though was he?
Migz needs to get up to speed. He doesn't have as much time as he thinks he does. but we all know Migz has the talent. I certianly wouldnt drop him in favour of Whalley!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 11:56:14 » |
|
Then he needs to show his talent, because its times like these our supposed better players need to pick the team up by their bootstraps and get them playing well.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Online
Posts: 33875
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 11:58:36 » |
|
Then he needs to show his talent, because its times like these our supposed better players need to pick the team up by their bootstraps and get them playing well. Bar Southend, He hasnt been that bad but I dont suppose you were at Tranmere or Walsall??
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 13:09:19 » |
|
I was at Wallsall, my old man was at Tranmere. We share similar views.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
santini
Offline
Posts: 890
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 13:21:16 » |
|
Migz and Whalley are not having the impact on the game that we need. Both seem content to lay off short passes to the side when what we need is decisive forward passes or movement.
We cannot afford the luxury of both in the same side. In fact I'd replace them both with Heath and Wells.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 13:25:32 » |
|
I agreed with Sanini (as i usually do) until he mentioned Wells. Not that i disagree, but i don't really know much about him. Heath needs to play more IMO.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Online
Posts: 33875
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:21:33 » |
|
I was at Wallsall You were? :shock:
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:24:12 » |
|
All i know is Heath should start and Collins shouldnt even be on the bench.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Leggett
Offline
Posts: 7860
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:29:34 » |
|
but where would you put heath? not on the left, leave nicolau on the left cos he actually possesesessesses (sp?) a left peg, and shakes has to start!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fuck you Leggett, fuck you.
|
|
|
le god cuervo
Offline
Posts: 1168
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:38:32 » |
|
if king wants to save his bacon he should go all out to win the game with a 4-3-3 (thats 4-3-3, not 4-5-1!!!). makes sense with the amount of strikers & attacking midfielders we have.
-------------heaton--------- jenks--ohanlon--ifil--smith heath------migz------pook roberts---fallon---thorpe
bench: bulman, collins, whalley, shakes, nicolau
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:38:39 » |
|
Heath in the centre with Migz, Whalley hasnt done anything, Nicolau on the left, Shakes on the Right, Fallon and Roberts up front.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Leggett
Offline
Posts: 7860
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:41:56 » |
|
cuervo, i agree. go out to win the fucking, not draw. i'd rather go down fighting than playing shitty defensive football, when the team blatantly has no real decent defense!!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fuck you Leggett, fuck you.
|
|
|
Spud
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 15:44:46 » |
|
If we start with 4-5-1 then im going to consider going back down the steps of the Nationwide stand and watching Soccer Saturday on the tv screens.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RappersDelight
Offline
Posts: 246
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: Friday, September 23, 2005, 16:06:59 » |
|
I was at Wallsall,. no you weren't!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Everybody's Smokin' - No one's gettin' high!
|
|
|
|