Pages: 1 ... 238 239 240 [241]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: The Squad List (2024/25 Edition)  (Read 511716 times)
Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG
TOLD YOU SO

Offline Offline

Posts: 7741





Ignore
« Reply #3600 on: Wednesday, January 15, 2025, 10:00:36 »

There's a lot McGurk doesn't do off the ball, but he's capable of moments of magic with it. In my view, he's a better version of Danny Butterworth. Multiple managers have now disagreed.

I agree with you as would most fans.

Must be shit in training.
Logged
Posh Red
Posh by name, Posh by nature

Offline Offline

Posts: 7849





Ignore
« Reply #3601 on: Wednesday, January 15, 2025, 10:10:12 »

Fair enough. There's plenty of our players who do nothing ON the ball as well. So I'd like to think we can strike a balance somewhere.

Any idea what position he actually plays for Yeovil? and what his role is? is he a winger or a #10?

Clearly a succession of managers don't agree.

Butterworth has scored a couple of worldies this season, and most on here want him dropped, and he works harder defensively than McGurk who without the ball plays like he thinks he's Messi
Logged
Bob1978

Offline Offline

Posts: 590




Ignore
« Reply #3602 on: Wednesday, January 15, 2025, 10:15:17 »

Yes McGurk scored a great individual goal v ebbsfleet BUT his team only managed a draw and he was subbed. I don’t think they’ve actually won a match yet with him in the team. Having said that I hope he proves his worth…
Logged
tans
You spin me right round baby right round

Offline Offline

Posts: 26221





Ignore
« Reply #3603 on: Wednesday, January 15, 2025, 10:38:12 »

Surely it must be an attitude to training thing or something like that?

Baffling no manager fancies him
Logged
Posh Red
Posh by name, Posh by nature

Offline Offline

Posts: 7849





Ignore
« Reply #3604 on: Wednesday, January 15, 2025, 10:59:10 »

Surely it must be an attitude to training thing or something like that?

Baffling no manager fancies him

I can't remember which game it was, but it was since Holloway has been here, but after coming on as a sub he lost the ball & basically strolled back as if it wasn't his job to try & get back and defend.

I'd imagine it's the kind of think that would infuriate a manager, especially Holloway.

If he does the same kind of thing in training, that might of explain his lack of playing time.

The farther down the level you play, it's easier to get away with as his talent level will outweigh the perceived lack of effort.
Logged
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33493


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #3605 on: Wednesday, January 15, 2025, 11:16:22 »

I can't remember which game it was, but it was since Holloway has been here, but after coming on as a sub he lost the ball & basically strolled back as if it wasn't his job to try & get back and defend.

I'd imagine it's the kind of think that would infuriate a manager, especially Holloway.

If he does the same kind of thing in training, that might of explain his lack of playing time.

The farther down the level you play, it's easier to get away with as his talent level will outweigh the perceived lack of effort.

Was it one of the Accrington games?

I can almost kinda see why Holloway might not see McGurk as a 90 minute man. Maybe not someone to Trust when you want solid & combative…but…why would you not at least have that kinda talent on the bench in ‘a throw on for 20 minutes if we need a goal’ capacity.

If we need a goal - I’d rather see McGurk entering the pitch than Butterworth.
Logged
Nemo
Shit Bacon

Offline Offline

Posts: 22886





Ignore
« Reply #3606 on: Wednesday, January 15, 2025, 11:18:39 »

It's hard to imagine McGurk being good at 'the run', and that seems to really matter.
Logged
adje

Offline Offline

Posts: 14470





Ignore
« Reply #3607 on: Wednesday, January 15, 2025, 12:02:34 »



If we need a goal - I’d rather see McGurk entering the pitch than Butterworth.
Exactly what I was thinking
Logged

quot;Molten memories splashing down
 upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
NotHarryAgombar

Offline Offline

Posts: 451




Ignore
« Reply #3608 on: Wednesday, January 15, 2025, 12:21:23 »

I think McGurk lacks the physicality needed in L2 - there were several games last season (Doncaster at home being one) where he was muscled off the ball far too easily. He is clearly a talented player, but at times he’s looked like a boy playing men’s football because of that.
I think his attitude when he loses the ball (commented on by others) also plays into that perception - the contrast with McGregor (similar size and build) is huge - McGregor’s commitment and energy to win the ball is obvious.
Logged
Oaksey Moonraker

Offline Offline

Posts: 933




Ignore
« Reply #3609 on: Wednesday, January 15, 2025, 14:33:01 »

Was it one of the Accrington games?

I can almost kinda see why Holloway might not see McGurk as a 90 minute man. Maybe not someone to Trust when you want solid & combative…but…why would you not at least have that kinda talent on the bench in ‘a throw on for 20 minutes if we need a goal’ capacity.

If we need a goal - I’d rather see McGurk entering the pitch than Butterworth.
It was the Morecambe game and he gave it away for the Hallam Hope winner.

I don't think McGurk fits the grind out the results approach Holloway wants and needs at the moment.

If we can put points on the board and get to relative safety then he could be brought back from loan. Not sure we are in Scott Twine on loan at Newport territory yet.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 238 239 240 [241]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: