|
Asher
|
 |
« Reply #120 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 12:55:48 » |
|
2) How long does it usually take to get 200 runs? More than 5 hours minus tea time??? I think its ours?!?!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
|
« Reply #121 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 12:56:56 » |
|
I don't understand cricket at all, but don't the shit batsmen (bowlers?) play last? We're knackered aren't we?!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Asher
|
|
« Reply #122 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 12:58:26 » |
|
Sussex Red and Asher - We both have no idea about this but its a good excuse to be pissed if we win
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Titch
 Offline
Posts: 1224
|
|
« Reply #123 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 12:59:59 » |
|
We are still ok at the moment i think. Jones is capable of putting a good few on the total and some of the others are capable of haging around.
It's all about the runs per over rate really. Just depends how many overs are left after we are bowled out really. Either way i think we are in a pretty good position at present but of course, as we have seen in this series, that is always liable to change.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
y wings are like a shield of steel!
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #124 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 13:00:06 » |
|
I don't understand cricket at all, but don't the shit batsmen (bowlers?) play last? We're knackered aren't we?! Yes they bat last!, we're still in this. Wish i was there the atmosphere is brilliant especially the rendition of 'God Save The Queen'. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Asher
|
|
« Reply #125 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 13:02:54 » |
|
ok ok say we are all out for 250, aussies start batting and get to 150 for 5, who wins?!?!?!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Titch
Offline
Posts: 1224
|
|
« Reply #126 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 13:04:25 » |
|
If that is the end of the day then it is a draw so we win the series.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
y wings are like a shield of steel!
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #127 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 13:09:03 » |
|
If that is the end of the day then it is a draw so we win the series.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3887
|
|
« Reply #128 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 13:09:26 » |
|
With 10 wickets in hand any total is pretty much chaseable. On the other hand going for the runs Australia are bound to lose wickets playing their shots.
The game could still go anyway, but Australia are still just ahead in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #129 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 13:13:54 » |
|
Collingwood has gone!, come on Jones!.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3887
|
|
« Reply #130 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 13:14:03 » |
|
Collingwood gone. Shit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
|
« Reply #131 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 13:16:41 » |
|
Sussex Red and Asher - We both have no idea about this but its a good excuse to be pissed if we win Absolutely I've kind of fucked up by cracking open the vodka about an hour ago. And I'm off work ill (genuine). Despite my surprise visit to the Merlin Saturday (to meet cuntface, no show, Ralphy), I still haven't met you. One day, eh! (although saw you in the bowl thing at Barnsley) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Asher
|
|
« Reply #132 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 13:17:32 » |
|
next time swindon win I will meet you for a pint (could be a long wait)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
|
« Reply #133 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 13:18:23 » |
|
We're knackered aren't we cricket people? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3887
|
|
« Reply #134 on: Monday, September 12, 2005, 13:19:21 » |
|
We're knackered aren't we cricket people? Knackered; no. In deep shit; yes. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
