|
Talk Talk
|
 |
« Reply #165 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 09:56:13 » |
|
He's actually right though. Even a broken watch is right twice a day.
Uh. My duff Casio LCD watch isn't  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Skinny Pete
|
|
« Reply #166 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 11:12:27 » |
|
Perhaps Paolo would welcome the opportunity to prove he can be successful without sacks of mullah
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Panda Paws
|
|
« Reply #167 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 11:14:40 » |
|
Perhaps he'll be a completely reformed character, but I doubt it...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Red Frog
Not a Dave
 Offline
Posts: 9047
Pondlife
|
|
« Reply #168 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 11:25:40 » |
|
I can't even begin to fathom why anyone would want that arsehole back. Granted, we had a good season with him but I would have got us promoted with that budget in League 2. The man's completely moronic and a bully. Speak to anyone inside the club - office staff, the media boys etc - when he was here, see if they'd have him back....
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Tout ce que je sais de plus sūr ą propos de la moralité et des obligations des hommes, c'est au football que je le dois. - Albert Camus
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #169 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 11:32:16 » |
|
Anyone who thinks he'd even consider coming back is utterly delusional
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
horlock07
Offline
Posts: 19145
Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost
|
|
« Reply #170 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 11:44:45 » |
|
Perhaps Paolo would welcome the opportunity to prove he can be successful without sacks of mullah
In light of our current situation would you want risk such an experiment? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheDukeOfBanbury
Offline
Posts: 4186
|
|
« Reply #171 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 11:45:48 » |
|
Bring him home.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Skinny Pete
|
|
« Reply #172 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 11:59:22 » |
|
In light of our current situation would you want risk such an experiment?
Paolo with no money versus a n other with no money is a no brainer. Not a cat in hells chance but this is about who people would like to see - not who will |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
@MacPhlea
Offline
Posts: 2325
|
|
« Reply #173 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 12:06:39 » |
|
Paolo openly criticised his players for tic-a-tac footballing, hated the youth set up and acted like a complete and utter prick behind closed door so.... I don't think it will fit with LPs vision at all and so people need to drop any thought of it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Skinny Pete
|
|
« Reply #174 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 12:09:39 » |
|
 Could do with some of the passion, though |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Paolo69
Offline
Posts: 2790
|
|
« Reply #175 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 12:12:25 » |
|
He will have got a new coat by now anyway. Results were crap the last time he did that!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PetsWinPrizes
Offline
Posts: 865
|
|
« Reply #176 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 12:15:17 » |
|
Even if we put aside the myriad of issues with appointing Paolo well chronicled above, do you really think his salary demands would fit with Powers budget
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #177 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 12:17:13 » |
|
Well that was a waste of a page.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57750
|
|
« Reply #178 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 12:17:43 » |
|
Nothing about Paolo fits this model. He'd have fallen out with Power before getting off the plane FFS!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #179 on: Thursday, October 22, 2015, 12:55:54 » |
|
If passion is the only qualification required for the job then we could appoint more or less anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
