Honkytonk
 Offline
Posts: 4476
Whoo Whoo!
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 13:46:51 » |
|
so fat so good.
That's a bit fair on poor old Tyrell, he looked in pretty good shape last time I saw him.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #31 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 16:52:47 » |
|
A young but experienced goalie with 100+ games, and an almost 1 in 2 clean sheet record = 1 million+, + add on's! That's to Bournemouth, round about 750k +add on's for anyone else.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
donkey
Cheers!
Offline
Posts: 7099
He headed a football.
|
|
« Reply #32 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 17:03:14 » |
|
He's the best keeper we've had since Digby. Those who think he won't be hard to replace should think how long it took us to replace Diggers.
Having said that Foderingham deserves to try his hand in the championship, but I hope he waits until seasons end...he may have the chance with us!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
donkey tells the truth
I headed the ball. eeeeeeeeeeeeeee-aaaaaaaawwwwwww |
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #33 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 17:33:48 » |
|
I can see why Bournemouth are looking. Only Barnsley and Millwall have a worse defensive record in that division so far this season (both having conceded 31 goals to Bournemouth's 30). Wes would be joining a shaky defence and would have the opportunity to make a visible impact quickly.
But - and I find myself thinking similar thoughts to when Ritchie joined them last year - does he really want to make his move to the Championship with a club that, most probably, has already peaked? I can't see them going much further than they already have on crowds of 9,000 in that division.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dr Pierre Chang
ITK Curran lover
Offline
Posts: 3054
|
|
« Reply #34 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 18:18:40 » |
|
Would be a big loss, but I would back Mcrory and Power to get more than a fair price for him. I was expecting him to depart a few months ago and was surprised when he signed the new deal.
Bournemouth would be a decent move. They are certainly showing ambition.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kerry red
|
|
« Reply #35 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 18:23:59 » |
|
They've got to be close to being bollixed regarding the wage cap.
If there's any way for Ritchie to come back as part of any deal - go for it.
They are not shipping goals cos of a dodgy keeper - it's the entire defence that's the problem
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dr Pierre Chang
ITK Curran lover
Offline
Posts: 3054
|
|
« Reply #36 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 18:25:16 » |
|
Do you honestly think there is any chance of Ritchie returning here? Did people believe the bullshit 'injury' cover up?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kerry red
|
|
« Reply #37 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 18:27:18 » |
|
If they don't want to play him, for whatever reason, why not?
Maybe there is one of those 'games played' clauses that will up what they owe.
He needs to be playing regularly for somebody
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dr Pierre Chang
ITK Curran lover
Offline
Posts: 3054
|
|
« Reply #38 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 18:30:32 » |
|
He was injured in pre season. He will probably be back on the bench for them at the weekend.
Also, I don't think it was a deal loaded in add on's and clauses somehow. As rushed a transfer as you are likely to see.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 18:37:18 by Dr Pierre Chang »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kerry red
|
|
« Reply #39 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 18:43:03 » |
|
A lot will depend on what happens with Ranger. We may have to be in the market for a replacement come January.
That and the decision on Ajose - who will cost if we keep him (which we should do, IMO).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dr Pierre Chang
ITK Curran lover
Offline
Posts: 3054
|
|
« Reply #40 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 18:45:43 » |
|
Some may disagree but I'd argue a replacement of equal quality for Ranger would set us back £300,000 minimum.. the sale of Foderingham might well go some way to funding a new number 9.
Ajose, if they would take £100,000 I wouldn't mind him, no more.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kerry red
|
|
« Reply #41 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 18:52:14 » |
|
£300,000 would probably mean a League 2 lump - or an unproven PL or Champ reserve.
Thought I heard Posh wanted somewhere near that amount for Ajose
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chunky monkey
|
|
« Reply #42 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 18:56:02 » |
|
Also, I don't think it was a deal loaded in add on's and clauses somehow.
Common knowledge that one |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dr Pierre Chang
ITK Curran lover
Offline
Posts: 3054
|
|
« Reply #43 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 18:57:01 » |
|
£300,000 would probably mean a League 2 lump - or an unproven PL or Champ reserve.
Thought I heard Posh wanted somewhere near that amount for Ajose
Obika on loan and an effort to sign Ajose is my guess should Ranger depart. Common knowledge that one
Did anyone suggest otherwise? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
THE FLASH
Offline
Posts: 9602
Quick as a Flash!
|
|
« Reply #44 on: Thursday, November 21, 2013, 19:05:38 » |
|
Just opened this...i wasn't feeling too good as it was...
What the fuck are we now.... a feeder club to those cunts?
Fucking depressing.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Clems Army!
|
|
|
|
