Compo
Offline
Posts: 1218
|
 |
« on: Sunday, August 14, 2005, 17:33:41 » |
|
Just seen Brizzol Shitty in there new fleshy colour kit, oh my god what is all that about, it has to be the worst kit ever, and not just cuz its Brizzol, its just wrong and abit gay..........
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33910
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Sunday, August 14, 2005, 17:36:00 » |
|
its 'fasionable' 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oxford_fan
Offline
Posts: 6764
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: Sunday, August 14, 2005, 17:37:01 » |
|
pic please
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: Sunday, August 14, 2005, 17:47:13 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: Sunday, August 14, 2005, 17:48:01 » |
|
They have to wear that against us live on sky sports 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33910
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: Sunday, August 14, 2005, 17:48:32 » |
|
Who is that wanker wearing it....unused sub at the weekend apparently....oh well not like he isnt used to sitting on the bench all game :twisted:
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: Sunday, August 14, 2005, 17:50:16 » |
|
Apparantly it's 'champagne gold' :fag: The city site said ''we wanted something the fans could wear to matches and down the street, something fashionable'' Well what went wrong then? 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Compo
Offline
Posts: 1218
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: Sunday, August 14, 2005, 17:57:08 » |
|
Heywood looked particularly gay in "champagne", in fact it looked more like piss than champagne 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: Sunday, August 14, 2005, 17:59:36 » |
|
Did you go and watch City yesterday then at Bouremouth??
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Compo
Offline
Posts: 1218
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: Sunday, August 14, 2005, 18:16:54 » |
|
Um no, i was sat behind u, wiv Leggett. I just saw it on HTV news, it was fuckin great......... 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: Sunday, August 14, 2005, 18:45:52 » |
|
Ah cause you were sorry! I just saw it on football league review on sky too 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: Sunday, August 14, 2005, 20:14:57 » |
|
Is it me or does anybody else think someone at City thought they were going to be champs this season with a kit like that!?. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
unclemark
Offline
Posts: 690
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: Sunday, August 14, 2005, 20:16:58 » |
|
They might be champions of League 2 next season.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sade
Offline
Posts: 6427
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: Monday, August 15, 2005, 08:28:11 » |
|
It looks all faded and crap and you can barely see the writing on the front!I suppose thats what the greedy fookers get for having 2 sponsers.
|
|
|
Logged
|
RED ARMY
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: Monday, August 15, 2005, 08:34:58 » |
|
Funny as fuck, when I saw the highlights on tv I thought City had forgotton their kit, looked like they were played in the nude! Disgraceful kit, one of the worst I have ever seen!
Just been speaking to some City fans btw, they said Smith was taken off half way through the last match then dropped for Saturday. Marcus Stewart was playing out wide on the left instead?!? Good decision play an out and out striker as a left winger! Carry on Mr Tinman.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|