News Monkey
Offline
Posts: 11830
|
 |
« on: Friday, May 17, 2013, 16:00:02 » |
|
Aden Flint one of four to stay at Swindon Town next season League One Swindon Town take up contract options on four first-team players, including central defender Aden Flint. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22566239
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
woolster
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Friday, May 17, 2013, 16:13:34 » |
|
Bullshit Freddie it is then
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57831
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: Friday, May 17, 2013, 16:45:25 » |
|
Why. It probably is BS but..., remember Mildenhall!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
phelpsieboy
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: Friday, May 17, 2013, 16:48:28 » |
|
How's it bullshit freddie. The reason the year option may have been taken is because it will mean we can sell them for monetary value.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hoboken
Offline
Posts: 306
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: Friday, May 17, 2013, 17:01:39 » |
|
I don't think it is rocket science for someone to say everyone is for sale. Everyone, every year is for sale at the right price. The interesting thing will be who they are sold to and for how much. Selling Wes, for example, to Sunderland or any Championship club? Ok. Selling him to a L1 club? A different matter.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dr Pierre Chang
ITK Curran lover
Offline
Posts: 3054
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: Friday, May 17, 2013, 17:05:30 » |
|
I don't think it is rocket science for someone to say everyone is for sale. Everyone, every year is for sale at the right price. The interesting thing will be who they are sold to and for how much. Selling Wes, for example, to Sunderland or any Championship club? Ok. Selling him to a L1 club? A different matter.
So if a L1 club offers more for Wes than a Championship club, you would rather we rejected that offer and accepted a lower one? If money is needed, then it doesn't matter where he goes as we saw with the Ritchie sale.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hoboken
Offline
Posts: 306
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: Friday, May 17, 2013, 17:52:04 » |
|
So if a L1 club offers more for Wes than a Championship club, you would rather we rejected that offer and accepted a lower one?
If money is needed, then it doesn't matter where he goes as we saw with the Ritchie sale.
Erm, no, I didn't say that. Read my post. I said WHO they are sold to and for HOW MUCH. It's a combination of the two, but in reality how likely is it that a L1 club will come in with a bigger offer than a Championship club anyway? My point is that we can't determine anything about the board if we sell a player for a good price to a Championship club...if we sell them to a rival for a perceived cheap price, that will tell us something (ref: Ritchie).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57831
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: Friday, May 17, 2013, 18:40:34 » |
|
Erm, no, I didn't say that. Read my post. I said WHO they are sold to and for HOW MUCH. It's a combination of the two, but in reality how likely is it that a L1 club will come in with a bigger offer than a Championship club anyway? My point is that we can't determine anything about the board if we sell a player for a good price to a Championship club...if we sell them to a rival for a perceived cheap price, that will tell us something (ref: Ritchie).
Seems a fair enough point does that.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: Friday, May 17, 2013, 19:57:54 » |
|
Low wages,young with the hope to cash in.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DRS
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: Friday, May 17, 2013, 20:28:45 » |
|
Low wages? you mad :-)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: Friday, May 17, 2013, 23:50:18 » |
|
Low wages? you mad :-)
not sure about Flint,but the other 3 yeah. I think Flint's will be significantly lower than others though.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33908
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: Saturday, May 18, 2013, 01:23:28 » |
|
Hope comes last week we were told Storey, Thompson, Flint and Bedwell had been offered new deals then a week later we're told the club have taken up automatic renewal options.
Does this mean the players in question were originally offered deals different to the renewal terms.
If this is the case, why - tribunal terms say that we have to offer them the same or a better contract (if we want compo) (or is that just wages?) So can we assume the board were maybe trying to get some clauses and or bonuses out of their current contracts?
Or have I just got the wrong end of the stick of the whole thing?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57831
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: Saturday, May 18, 2013, 06:26:09 » |
|
That's how I remember it reported too DV.
Not sure if the Advers info was slightly off or not though. Maybe we always were simply taking the option.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kerry red
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: Saturday, May 18, 2013, 08:07:53 » |
|
Low wages? you mad :-) [/quote
You'd be completely gobsmacked if you knew what was offered, and accepted.
I couldn't believe it
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 26817
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: Saturday, May 18, 2013, 08:31:59 » |
|
Spill then
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|