Pages: 1 ... 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 ... 263   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Lee Power  (Read 527668 times)
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey

Offline Offline

Posts: 19341


?Absolute Calamity!?




Ignore
« Reply #705 on: Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 11:31:59 »

So what did Clem’s £1.1m actually buy?

It’s got to 15% of the club otherwise why would he hand over money. But, if so, why is Clem not listed as a director?

Surely, with Clem’s close links to the Trust he could explain in detail what he does actually own.

So the £250,000 is for Power’s arse pocket with whoever picking up the debts.

On that basis, why doesn’t the Trust - maybe via Eady - offer Power £500,000 to fuck off  then hand the club over to Clem.
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 55287





Ignore
« Reply #706 on: Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 11:42:13 »

He's a minority shareholder with no power.

It is only within Power's gift to appoint him as a director
Logged
horlock07

Offline Offline

Posts: 18726


Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost




Ignore
« Reply #707 on: Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 11:53:46 »

So then if Standing owns 50% of Swinton reds but has no share in Seebek then he has no claim to owning 50% of the club or are they not mutually exclusive?

Which company do Axis own 15% of?

Does this matter?

I am sure its done to protect the clubs existance but it seems fucking long winded way of doing things of which I am still not 100% certain who ACTUALLY owns what and why shares are issued by each company?

Right, as its lunchtime I've had a look on Companies House.

As of a return made in January 2016 it suggests the shareholding of STFC Ltd is broadly 99.8% owned by Seebeck 87 Ltd with the remaining being 'other'... (FWIW there appear to be 311,376,908 shares in the company - 308,188,451 Ordinary and 3,188,457 deferred).

Taking a step up the chain a Confirmation Statement in April 2017 suggests that there are 100 shares in Seebeck 87 Ltd, whilst there is no breakdown of shareholding it is confirmed that Swinton Reds 20 Ltd is a PSC which means they own over 75% of the shares.

Finally Swinton Reds 20 Ltd a Confirmation Statement in August 2019 suggests that there are 100 shares, 85 owned by Mr L Power and 15 by Axis Football Investments Ltd (AFIL).

And for completeness AFIL has a single share, owned by Clem!

Right I'm off to go and get out more.....  Wink
Logged
horlock07

Offline Offline

Posts: 18726


Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost




Ignore
« Reply #708 on: Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 11:59:04 »

So what did Clem’s £1.1m actually buy?


And considering he paid £1.1m apparently, what was the other £850k for and where has it gone?
Logged
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.

Offline Offline

Posts: 59260


Back Off Man, I’m A Scientist.



« Reply #709 on: Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 11:59:10 »

Thanks for the insight Smiley
Logged

Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey

Offline Offline

Posts: 19341


?Absolute Calamity!?




Ignore
« Reply #710 on: Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 12:01:56 »

So, if Seebeck is for all intents and purposes the club, Power owns it entirely. So why does he have to get legal permission to sell something he owns 100% of? I was under the impression that the whole shebang hinged on Clem owning 15% of the club and Standing claiming to own 50% of Power’s 85%. He’s actually claiming he owns 50% of the entire club.

Clem owns 15% of Swinton Reds - whatever they actually are.

I’m totally confused!
Logged
horlock07

Offline Offline

Posts: 18726


Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost




Ignore
« Reply #711 on: Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 12:12:45 »

So, if Seebeck is for all intents and purposes the club, Power owns it entirely. So why does he have to get legal permission to sell something he owns 100% of? I was under the impression that the whole shebang hinged on Clem owning 15% of the club and Standing claiming to own 50% of Power’s 85%. He’s actually claiming he owns 50% of the entire club.

Clem owns 15% of Swinton Reds - whatever they actually are.

I’m totally confused!

Its just a stream of holding companies basically STFC is the asset which is owned by Seebeck albeit Seebeck is an asset ultimately owned by Swinton.
Logged
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey

Offline Offline

Posts: 19341


?Absolute Calamity!?




Ignore
« Reply #712 on: Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 12:23:11 »

I presume when Swinton Reds was set up the ignorant twat thought he was actually spelling Swindon.

If that’s the case, it explains a lot.
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 55287





Ignore
« Reply #713 on: Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 12:32:22 »

Swinton is Manchester isn't it? Assumed he had some link up there, but now you mention it. ...
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11688




Ignore
« Reply #714 on: Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 12:33:58 »

Clem originally paid 1.1m for Shares, which was later adjusted to a lower amount so that Power could avoid Capital Gains Tax.  The remainder should be listed as a loan somewhere - people mentioning it was missing may well be because the accounts are a year in arrears and it hasn't been reflected as such yet.  However, it may also be used by Power to show different relative values of the offers for now if Clem is including his investment to date, but Able are showing the need to pay that off/account for it.  Certainly seems Power is playing for every loophole/timing benefit he can try and achieve.
« Last Edit: Thursday, May 20, 2021, 12:46:14 by RobertT » Logged
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey

Offline Offline

Posts: 19341


?Absolute Calamity!?




Ignore
« Reply #715 on: Thursday, May 20, 2021, 05:31:26 »

So, Clem has offered Power £250,000 and to take on the debts. He says this is not as good as Able’s offer. Yet he has said he would happily sell the club to Able for £1.

Wtf?
Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27137





Ignore
« Reply #716 on: Thursday, May 20, 2021, 07:40:30 »

Maybe Able are offering to clear the debt in one go, so cash in Power's pocket, whereas Axis aren't?
Logged
Briggany

Offline Offline

Posts: 125





Ignore
« Reply #717 on: Thursday, May 20, 2021, 07:52:31 »

From what the Trust gathered from the court hearing is that Able have preferential terms and get time to pay of the debts within the first 2 years.

Axis have to pay it all of straight away, which I assume they are willing to do if they are still putting in a bid.
Logged
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.

Offline Offline

Posts: 59260


Back Off Man, I’m A Scientist.



« Reply #718 on: Thursday, May 20, 2021, 08:48:35 »

Maybe Able are offering to clear the debt in one go, so cash in Power's pocket, whereas Axis aren't?
The judge was told by Powers solicitors that this is the case, Able and Axis are treating some debts as non priority or not considered part of the clubs debt differently which could explain why one bid is valued less than the other bid even though they are of an "on paper" similar amount, one will obviously leave Power with a bigger shortfall that he himself will have to pay back and not the club.

Or thats how it sounded when the judge asked her but she was so vague at times that even he was frustrated by her apparent lack of facts on this.
Logged

Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
horlock07

Offline Offline

Posts: 18726


Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost




Ignore
« Reply #719 on: Thursday, May 20, 2021, 09:03:54 »

Next week........

 Beers

What day are we expecting this to happen this week?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 ... 263   Go Up
Print
Jump to: