|
|
SuggWillSugg MBE
 Online
Posts: 2940
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 01:31:04 » |
|
[url width=512 height=285]http://i.minus.com/ib2zyTs2yHMMM6.gif[/url]
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bukkake Regiment
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 01:56:48 » |
|
I'm sorry but you need to work on your gifing. Worst. gif. ever.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
thedarkprince
 Offline
Posts: 2747
Hubba-hubba
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 04:15:27 » |
|
Get the impression that Jed would be disappointed if this is true.
Non-story in my eyes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bone Machine
Offline
Posts: 4
Idiot in a Kilt
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 09:02:36 » |
|
If his lawyers are sane, they'll tell him to stop being silly. But then, he's probably looked long and hard for lawyers who're as mad as him.
Still, if he threatens to sue the club and in return the club threaten to complain to the police about aggravated trespass, burglary and criminal damage, I'm guessing I know what will happen…
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's not the despair that hurts. It's the hope.
|
|
|
Stegenfreud
Offline
Posts: 486
Say what now?
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 09:06:14 » |
|
To what aim? (Other than money) He'll just be harming those that DID support him - the fans. If true this is very disappointing... He doesn't need the money or moral high ground so why not just walk away?
Oh and Phil Spencer is a cunt.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
simon FERRY cross the avon... do do.
|
|
|
Exiled Bob
Offline
Posts: 1562
Likes a moan
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 09:12:45 » |
|
If true, it confirms what a spiteful, self-obsessed prick Di Canio is.
What I don't understand is, Di Canio apparently resigned on the Tuesday before the Tranmere game and then negotiated a short term contract afterwards that then expired once the deadline that he set had passed. Surely the new contract would have nullified any previous contract. And, it would be surprising if the new Board had left a clause in it leaving them open to this sort of thing…..
Di Canio is certainly doing his best to make himself unemployable by clubs in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 09:41:47 » |
|
To what aim? (Other than money) He'll just be harming those that DID support him - the fans. If true this is very disappointing... He doesn't need the money or moral high ground so why not just walk away?
Oh and Phil Spencer is a cunt.
he does seem to have a need to be right, to have the last word and to be justified in everything he does. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 09:47:00 » |
|
he does seem to have a need to be right, to have the last word and to be justified in everything he does.
He should sign up on here, he'd fit right in  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 10:57:06 » |
|
If his lawyers are sane, they'll tell him to stop being silly. But then, he's probably looked long and hard for lawyers who're as mad as him.
Still, if he threatens to sue the club and in return the club threaten to complain to the police about aggravated trespass, burglary and criminal damage, I'm guessing I know what will happen…
aggravated trespass ? How does that work then ? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 11:01:31 » |
|
aggravated trespass ?
How does that work then ?
It doesn't, not in this instance. Aggravated trespass was the legislation brought in to try and combat hunt saboteurs. It elevates the simple (civil) act of trespass into a criminal offence when the person(s) trespassing do so with intent to disrupt a lawful activity (i.e. hunting). It wouldn't apply here, even though it sounds like it might. Classic case of sounding like you know what you're talking about (Not you Fred) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 11:05:11 » |
|
It doesn't, not in this instance. Aggravated trespass was the legislation brought in to try and combat hunt saboteurs. It elevates the simple (civil) act of trespass into a criminal offence when the person(s) trespassing do so with intent to disrupt a lawful activity (i.e. hunting). It wouldn't apply here, even though it sounds like it might. Classic case of sounding like you know what you're talking about (Not you Fred) Thanks Paul, was just fishing to see if he actually knew what the fuck he was on about obviously not |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27180
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 11:10:39 » |
|
It doesn't, not in this instance. Aggravated trespass was the legislation brought in to try and combat hunt saboteurs. It elevates the simple (civil) act of trespass into a criminal offence when the person(s) trespassing do so with intent to disrupt a lawful activity (i.e. hunting). It wouldn't apply here, even though it sounds like it might. Classic case of sounding like you know what you're talking about (Not you Fred) I'm getting the impression that you're quite familiar with aggravated trespass...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 11:11:16 » |
|
I'm getting the impression that you're quite familiar with aggravated trespass... Careful now... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Friday, March 1, 2013, 11:45:47 » |
|
Thanks Paul, was just fishing to see if he actually knew what the fuck he was on about
obviously not
Well to be fair I think his broad thrust (that if Di Canio genuinely was daft enough to sue, the club would have plenty of counterexamples to go at) was broadly accurate. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
