Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Adver News: Patey the debt-buster  (Read 7068 times)
News Monkey

Offline Offline

Posts: 11830




« on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 05:00:11 »

Patey the debt-buster
           
           



  SIR William Patey has revealed that Sir Martyn Arbib is willing to write off the debt owed to him by Swindon Town, and the new Robins chairman has encouraged Andrew Fitton to follow suit and help the club emerge from their transfer embargo.

           

http://www.thisisswindontownfc.co.uk/news/headlines/9998185.Patey_the_debt_buster/?ref=rss
           
           
           
Logged
Nemo
Shit Bacon

Online Online

Posts: 23626





Ignore
« Reply #1 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:04:10 »

Bit cheeky, obviously no idea of who is owed what but Arbib is a whole lot richer than Fitton and I'm sure he'd miss the money a lot less.
Logged
fittons_coaching_badge

Offline Offline

Posts: 2059




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:06:02 »

This might be a bit of a dim question but .....

When he says the debt is worthless .... Surely £1m owed is £1m owed isnt it?
Logged
kerry red

« Reply #3 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:11:43 »

Well, if the debt is in the way of personal loans to STFC, and they have the best interests of STFC at heart, they know the debt will never be repaid.

But getting it off the balance sheet will get the club below the cap which has led to the embargo.

Looks like this is the way to keep PdC on board
Logged
Flashheart

« Reply #4 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:15:18 »

I don't see how having debt written off will affect the embargo. It's calculated on revenue, not debt.
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 57829





Ignore
« Reply #5 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:19:12 »

When he says the debt is worthless .... Surely £1m owed is £1m owed isnt it?

I read that as '£1m never repaid' is essentially the same as writing off the debt.

Its great Sir Martyn is prepared to to do such a thing, but surely Fitton et al invested so they'd have first dibbs  on any 'success' in the first place.

Meh, who knows. Wait and see...

I don't see how having debt written off will affect the embargo. It's calculated on revenue, not debt.

I heard the radio interview. Essentially because with the debt gone  Black would probably release more cash for equity.
Logged
Ardiles

Offline Offline

Posts: 11588


Stirlingshire Reds




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:21:28 »

This is pure guesswork, but when you write off a liability the credit is taken to the company's P&L.  For the accountants out there:

Dr  Liability (B/S)
Cr  Income  (P&L)

Might it be that the credit arising on the write off of the liability is counted towards the 'Revenue' figure?  It would be strange if it did - but you never know.
Logged
kerry red

« Reply #7 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:22:58 »

I don't see how having debt written off will affect the embargo. It's calculated on revenue, not debt.

Not sure, but I presume the debt is inflating the revenue so getting rid will get us below the threshold

May be talking bollocks
Logged
Bewster

Offline Offline

Posts: 4004


We fucking love you Gumbo!




Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:33:26 »

Patey = Derren Brown

Back in the room
Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27180





Ignore
« Reply #9 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:36:29 »

Hi I'm William Patey and this is Cillit Bang.

One squirt and BANG! the debt is gone.
Logged
Bewster

Offline Offline

Posts: 4004


We fucking love you Gumbo!




Ignore
« Reply #10 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:39:48 »

Hi I'm William Patey and this is Cillit Bang.

One squirt and BANG! the manager is gone.
Logged
DMR

« Reply #11 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:39:53 »

Since when has begging your creditors to waive the debt counted as "debt busting?" If this was Diamandis doing it we'd all be in fucking meltdown

Bad feeling about this
Logged
Ardiles

Offline Offline

Posts: 11588


Stirlingshire Reds




Ignore
« Reply #12 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:45:12 »

I have a feeling that something may have been lost in translation here.  So far as I'm aware - although I could be wrong here - Sir Martyn Arbib came on board as an investor, not as a fan (although he may well have become one since).  There were no tales back in 2007 of a boyhood dream fulfilled, or how he spent many happy Saturday afternoons watching Don Rogers and Roger Smart from the Town End.  Why would he write this off?  I would not expect him to.
Logged
fittons_coaching_badge

Offline Offline

Posts: 2059




Ignore
« Reply #13 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:48:22 »

I have a feeling that something may have been lost in translation here.  So far as I'm aware - although I could be wrong here - Sir Martyn Arbib came on board as an investor, not as a fan (although he may well have become one since).  There were no tales back in 2007 of a boyhood dream fulfilled, or how he spent many happy Saturday afternoons watching Don Rogers and Roger Smart from the Town End.  Why would he write this off?  I would not expect him to.

Isnt he only allowed in the country 30 days a year or so?  Can be that much of a fan.
Logged
Flashheart

« Reply #14 on: Monday, October 22, 2012, 08:51:50 »

Why would he write this off? 

On the understanding that if successful his share of the club would be worth more than the amount he writes off and attracting further investment will help them achieve that.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
Print
Jump to: