Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 [11] 12   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Your views on the news  (Read 23976 times)
walcot red

Offline Offline

Posts: 1549





Ignore
« Reply #150 on: Sunday, October 21, 2012, 19:00:12 »

I don't watch the news as it's far too depressing but I must admit I find this pretty reprehensible. How can the Government who are supposed to be acting in our best interests let them get away with it?

They're in it for themselves. They're cunts. Or both.
Logged
stfcinbmth

« Reply #151 on: Sunday, October 21, 2012, 19:10:12 »

They're in it for themselves. They're cunts. Or both.

Both probably fits the bill
Logged
jonny72

Offline Offline

Posts: 5554





Ignore
« Reply #152 on: Sunday, October 21, 2012, 19:24:06 »

I don't watch the news as it's far too depressing but I must admit I find this pretty reprehensible. How can the Government who are supposed to be acting in our best interests let them get away with it?

Technically what they are doing is legal, though there is maybe a question over them artificially inflating the prices they pay to other parts of the same company for services and products. So Starbucks pay an inflated price to their subsidiaries for the beans and the rights to use the Starbucks name and branding - moving the actual profit to those subsidiaries. Which may be illegal and some companies are being investigated over this.

I'd argue the real problem is with the Governments that set ridiculously low tax rates and the EU for letting them. Not sure it helps their economies in the long term, they are just giving money away to the big corporations and taking it from other countries. Take Ireland for example, it didn't help them avoid needing a hand out and the countries that bailed them out (the UK and the richer EU countries) are the very ones they are basically stealing from. I'd have told them to go fuck themselves.

Apple are pretty bad for this, even in the USA. If a state wants them they have to give grants and discounted tax rates. Once they've got them and setup the operation, Apple then divert their profits to places they can pay even less tax. If a state questions their behaviour Apple threaten to up sticks and go elsewhere. Of course if the states got together they could stop Apple from doing this, make them pay more in taxes to the benefit of everyone. Except everyone just thinks about themselves.
Logged
ghanimah

Offline Offline

Posts: 3639





Ignore
« Reply #153 on: Sunday, October 21, 2012, 19:41:11 »

I'd argue the real problem is with the Governments that set ridiculously low tax rates and the EU for letting them. Not sure it helps their economies in the long term, they are just giving money away to the big corporations and taking it from other countries. Take Ireland for example, it didn't help them avoid needing a hand out and the countries that bailed them out (the UK and the richer EU countries) are the very ones they are basically stealing from. I'd have told them to go fuck themselves.


Presumably you're not suggesting that the unelected EU should tell countries how to set their own tax rates? As for Ireland they were fucked by joining what is essentially a flawed currency
Logged

"We perform the duties of freemen; we must have the privileges of freemen ..."
jonny72

Offline Offline

Posts: 5554





Ignore
« Reply #154 on: Sunday, October 21, 2012, 19:49:17 »

Presumably you're not suggesting that the unelected EU should tell countries how to set their own tax rates?

They already do - there is an EU minimum VAT rate of 15%.
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36318




« Reply #155 on: Sunday, October 21, 2012, 22:18:38 »

On the flip side Starbucks will have paid loads of taxes in the form of VAT and Employers' National Insurance contributions.
Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27137





Ignore
« Reply #156 on: Friday, October 26, 2012, 07:29:23 »

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20091472

What a great idea, let's raid pension funds and use the money to build houses!

Then when house prices finally correct, not only will a lot of people be in negative equity they won't have a pension either. Genius!
Logged
wiggy
Whippet fancying, T-shirt flogging cunt

Offline Offline

Posts: 2612


Whippet Fancier




Ignore
« Reply #157 on: Friday, October 26, 2012, 08:03:01 »

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20091472

What a great idea, let's raid pension funds and use the money to build houses!

Then when house prices finally correct, not only will a lot of people be in negative equity they won't have a pension either. Genius!

This beggars belief.

The pension funds are not an asset of the council.

Architects in saying people should emply them more shocker.
Logged

Thank [insert deity of choice] for beer and peanuts
Ardiles

Offline Offline

Posts: 11528


Stirlingshire Reds




Ignore
« Reply #158 on: Friday, October 26, 2012, 08:35:21 »

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20091472

What a great idea, let's raid pension funds and use the money to build houses!

Then when house prices finally correct, not only will a lot of people be in negative equity they won't have a pension either. Genius!

I agree with the general point that pension funds should not be used for something like this.  But responding to the secondary point about house prices, they have been correcting now for some time.  In real terms (ie adjusted for inflation, which has let rip during the double dip), they are something like 20% below the 2007 peak.  Even when compared to average earnings which, obviously, have not kept pace with inflation, the house price/average earnings ratio has fallen back towards the historical average.  Not sure there is much more of the correction still to come - barring another blow up/Euro collapse etc.  Prices also being supported by a massive undersupply of new homes and very low interest rates - neither of which are likely to change any time soon.
Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27137





Ignore
« Reply #159 on: Friday, October 26, 2012, 08:56:01 »

Agree with you entirely about the values vs. inflation, but I do not believe there has been a proper correction. There is a very large negative equity bubble forming. When that bursts property will not be able to sustain it's capital value.
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #160 on: Friday, October 26, 2012, 09:00:32 »

Its nothing new. Governments raided the royal mail profit pot for years to fund other things then said there's no money left and the public swallowed it blaming the postmen's greed-lazyness.
Logged
Ardiles

Offline Offline

Posts: 11528


Stirlingshire Reds




Ignore
« Reply #161 on: Friday, October 26, 2012, 09:08:20 »

Agree with you entirely about the values vs. inflation, but I do not believe there has been a proper correction. There is a very large negative equity bubble forming. When that bursts property will not be able to sustain it's capital value.

But the trend from the last 3 to 4 years has reversed.  Instead of borrowing more against their homes (as they did during the bubble years), homeowners are now paying down mortgage debt faster than the banks are making new loans...assisted by rock bottom interest rates.  There are always going to be those at the margins who lose out but, across the general homeowning population, I'm pretty sure that the negative equity situation is getting better, not worse.
Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27137





Ignore
« Reply #162 on: Friday, October 26, 2012, 09:41:04 »

No, it's increasing year on year according to JPMorgan's latest guide.

Some examples below showing % of mortgages in negative equity, year on year (2010 to Q4 2011):

North West 10.1% 11.5%
North East 7.2% 11.9%
West Midlands 5.0% 8.2%
South West 2.1% 4.9%
Logged
Ardiles

Offline Offline

Posts: 11528


Stirlingshire Reds




Ignore
« Reply #163 on: Friday, October 26, 2012, 09:48:16 »

Then I stand corrected!
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #164 on: Friday, October 26, 2012, 09:49:11 »

 I was interested in reading today that HM Government has politely turned down US soundings, about their using our bases on Diego Garcia, Ascension Island and Cyprus for a pre-emptive strike at Iran nuclear facilities...apparently it might be illegal.

Nevertheless, the Israelis will have no such scruples....Obama or Romney  Suicide
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 [11] 12   Go Up
Print
Jump to: