Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« on: Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 11:57:11 » |
|
great....93-6. think i might go out soon.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 12:04:53 » |
|
it's all down to pieterson then...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 13:37:54 » |
|
At least the scores half decent to defend but no Jones now which isnt good news.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 13:39:37 » |
|
why didn't they drop gough?
thicko vaughan strikes again :x
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 13:51:36 » |
|
why didn't they drop gough?
thicko vaughan strikes again :x Yes i agree with that, you can guarantee that Goughs going to get smashed all over the shop again which we cant afford to let happen. Jones is young, so why wasnt he inlcuded instead!?, well done Michael Vaughan.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 14:01:51 » |
|
Wha a fucking twat Lehmann is!, they just showed England beating the Aussies way back and it went back to the studio and Gower turned to Lehmann and said "Not many happy memories that day!?" "i think so cos didnt we win the series 3-1?" replied Lehmann "yes but this is a United Kingdom broadcast and we like to concentrate on the successes if we can!" talk about piss on his Strawberrys.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 14:07:32 » |
|
That Melbourne 98 was a great great win. Fanastic. The BBC had the highlights at that time and were showing them at 6pm on BBC2. I went ballistic when Goughie got the final wicket. Managed to get back from college (all day) without hearing the score.
That show of passion, goughie with wicket in hand is something the Aussies will never beat us at. EN-GER-LAND!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 15:01:11 » |
|
well its not a bad total to defend but gilchrist is going well.... :|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 15:29:55 » |
|
Fucking Gough's getting slaughtered!, should have gone with Simon Jones.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
blinkpip
His Infernal Majesty
Offline
Posts: 6747
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 15:45:06 » |
|
But he taken a wicket.
|
|
|
Logged
|
ee the trick is only pick on those that can't do you no harm Like the drummer from Def Leppard's only got one arm
I annoyed Yeovilred 28/01/06
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 16:45:37 » |
|
Gough has figures of 4 overs 1-37
It really doesnt matter if he's taken a wicket as he's going for 9.25 runs per over. Before this game his average in the series was 93.00, and his economy was 5.36 runs per over. :|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 17:08:03 » |
|
well....oval pitch was obviously suited for batsman and england didn't turn up.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 18:05:28 » |
|
Fuck.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 05:03:28 » |
|
Why the fuck are we playing the first test match at Lords?, it suits the Aussies as they havent lost there since the 1930's :evil: surely it would have been better to have the 3rd or 4th test there. :-))(
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3891
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 10:10:27 » |
|
who gives a fuck about history
i bet simon jones, harmison and hoggard don't have a clue about that stat. it won't have any effect on the 1st Test
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|