Only Me
 Offline
Posts: 1202
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 12:11:27 » |
|
It is, but you can spell it with a u in, I should know!
Maybe you can, but in this case you don't  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
stfcinbmth
|
|
« Reply #46 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 12:31:21 » |
|
Start Connell and leave him on. That is all
My sentiments exactly |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Miles Mayhem
Offline
Posts: 1404
|
|
« Reply #47 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 15:00:33 » |
|
My sentiments exactly
who would you drop though? Kerrouche played well and PDC seems to always want a big man up front |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Coca Fola
|
|
« Reply #48 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 15:01:48 » |
|
I was impressed with all 3 strikers yesterday. Tough choice. I'd edge towards Connell and Magera. The bring Kerooooooooosh on for the last half an hour.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
Offline
Posts: 9044
|
|
« Reply #49 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 15:05:56 » |
|
but then you lose the mighty keroooosh's corners - tough one...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Coca Fola
|
|
« Reply #50 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 15:06:44 » |
|
Fair point. It's definitely a tough choice. It's been a long time since we've had a genuine dilemma with which strikers to play.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #51 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 15:08:38 » |
|
but then you lose the mighty keroooosh's corners - tough one...
I mentioned this yesterday, finally we have someone who is decent at putting a good corner in. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57751
|
|
« Reply #52 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 16:37:58 » |
|
His corner taking was certainly noted in our section of the DRS too.
Tough call for PDC. I suspect he'll go for Keroooosh and Magera. Which is bloody tough on Connell. Then we have the prospect of another striker coming in...though that's only at the enquiry stage so we may not.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 16:41:22 by Batch »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
|
« Reply #53 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 16:53:17 » |
|
Thing is with getting a new striker is although i agree we need a defender if we are being given a opportunity to bring in someone who the manager feels is better than what we got then we would be foolish not to take it up.
The fact we were in for the Aresenal lad though does seem to suggest that we are still looking at bringing one in.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
stfcinbmth
|
|
« Reply #54 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 17:14:12 » |
|
who would you drop though? Kerrouche played well and PDC seems to always want a big man up front
Kerooosh and Connell |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
skin_im_buzzer
Offline
Posts: 160
|
|
« Reply #55 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 17:55:16 » |
|
I wonder if Paolo would consider Kerrooooooooosh playing the role that De Vita played (left-mid pushing forwards), as he worked the channels pretty well (better than I would expect Magera and Connell to as he's slightly more mobile).
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lambourn red
|
|
« Reply #56 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 19:35:35 » |
|
I wonder if Paolo would consider Kerrooooooooosh playing the role that De Vita played (left-mid pushing forwards), as he worked the channels pretty well (better than I would expect Magera and Connell to as he's slightly more mobile).
Thoughts?
I thought exactly the same Connel and Magera up front with Ritchie and Keroosh on the wings and De Vita to come off the bench would rip a second arse hole in most teams in League 2 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #57 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 19:36:47 » |
|
No Gabilondo?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lambourn red
|
|
« Reply #58 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 19:40:24 » |
|
I forgot about him, was he injured yesterday?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
skin_im_buzzer
Offline
Posts: 160
|
|
« Reply #59 on: Sunday, September 4, 2011, 20:06:25 » |
|
No Gabilondo? I was thinking for home games when we might want to adopt more of a 4-3-3 style, like we did against Rotherham, with the 3rd striker playing as a very far forward midfielder/wide striker. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
