luckyluke699
 Offline
Posts: 614
5 league goals and counting...
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 15:04:16 » |
|
Ta, figured that was probably the reason!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 15:07:35 » |
|
Wrong time to be redeveloping when you're on a downward trajectory. Let's have the team at least pushing for the Championship before we finalise any plans. If we try this in League 2, we'll end up hiring a consultant who will advise we build to 12,000 capacity and, at a stroke, we'll have fixed a ceiling on our ambitions for the next 40 or 50 years.
We need to be on the up before we start thinking about this again...or we'll end up with something tinpot like Oxford.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
luckyluke699
Offline
Posts: 614
5 league goals and counting...
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 15:27:49 » |
|
Wrong time to be redeveloping when you're on a downward trajectory. Let's have the team at least pushing for the Championship before we finalise any plans. If we try this in League 2, we'll end up hiring a consultant who will advise we build to 12,000 capacity and, at a stroke, we'll have fixed a ceiling on our ambitions for the next 40 or 50 years.
We need to be on the up before we start thinking about this again...or we'll end up with something tinpot like Oxford.
I've got an idea, why don't we only build "some" of the stands now, and the rest once we're back where we belong?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 15:28:49 » |
|
Because it's not a priority.
And splitting the redevelopment would add cost, and make the project more difficult to manage.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 15:30:14 » |
|
That was sort of the plan anyway wasn't it? stand by stand. see no reason why they can't push on with it personally.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
 Online
Posts: 33875
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 15:32:11 » |
|
I always thought the time frame of re-development had alot to do with the current lease running out next year?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 15:38:14 » |
|
You might not have noticed, but the economy is fucked both locally and nationally. The current owners arrived with their plans just before the Banker's induced crash....so their ideas flew out the window.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
luckyluke699
Offline
Posts: 614
5 league goals and counting...
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 15:40:33 » |
|
We need to be on the up before we start thinking about this again...or we'll end up with something tinpotlike Oxford.
I've got an idea, why don't we only build "some" of the stands now, and the rest once we're back where we belong? Sorry guys, I was taking the piss, but I didn't anticipate no one catching on - probably didn't make it clear enough to be fair. The "some" was aimed at Oxford having 3 stands using this very logic. And because they're Oxford, will remain having only 3 stands...  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 15:42:04 by luckyluke699 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Trashbat?
Offline
Posts: 1655
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 15:50:39 » |
|
Certainly Blackpool and Plymouth are 2 examples of building a stadium bit by bit at our level. Although I think the difference is that you need to have a plan to start with, no point starting to build not knowing if its going to end up as 12k or 20k.
Plus the new stadium needs to have facilities to create a revenue stream other than football which I believe are also a major part of our plans not only the capacity size.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
luckyluke699
Offline
Posts: 614
5 league goals and counting...
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 15:52:05 » |
|
Certainly Blackpool and Plymouth are 2 examples of building a stadium bit by bit at our level. Although I think the difference is that you need to have a plan to start with, no point starting to build not knowing if its going to end up as 12k or 20k.
Plus the new stadium needs to have facilities to create a revenue stream other than football which I believe are also a major part of our plans not only the capacity size.
Oh dear, I really didn't intend to start a genuine in depth discussion. Can we please remember the 80% bollocks part that attracted me to this site in the first place? (queue gay joke!!) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Trashbat?
Offline
Posts: 1655
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 15:54:29 » |
|
you are gay
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 18:23:40 » |
|
If you build a 3 sided ground like Blackpool or the Pox, then you basically have to get in the Premier League to finnish it off.
Pox wont have 4 sides again unless they leave the Kassam.
A 3 sided ground is an absolute curse.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Grim Reaper
Offline
Posts: 1779
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 19:54:50 » |
|
I love our stadium. If we could just build a new Stratton Bank Stand and put ALL the away fans in there I think we would have more than a decent ground for a few years.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 20:06:22 » |
|
I love our stadium.
I wonder when football grounds became stadiums....I just can't think of the CG as anything other than a Ground. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Grim Reaper
Offline
Posts: 1779
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 20:11:11 » |
|
For me Reg it was when all the seats replaced terracing. Had some good times on the old Shivvy Road but times move on,
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
