The question is if M.K really have no history - why are they hated? I neither like or dislike them - I don't care about them. But people hate them because of what they did in their change from Wimbledon (which was not right at all I agree 100%)
AFC are just the same in the sense of setting up a new team (don't forget in doing so they nicked a lot of Kingstonian supporters) but without the bad stuff.They may have been 'given' the history but it really it not theirs
Franchise didn't just 'change' from Wimbledon.
They are an entirely new club that stole the legitimate place of a legitimate team. Every other team has to start in non-league and work their way up, just as the real dons have done. All except for the franchise who purchased their league position.
Do you think that's fair?
