Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Adver News: £20million stadium plan ground to a halt  (Read 3863 times)
Peter Venkman
Past glories motivate us when times are bleak.

Offline Offline

Posts: 64646


Perfection is not attainable



« Reply #15 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 09:45:33 »

I agree with most of this posted here but Mrverve has hit the nail on the head.
Logged

From the station at Colchester
To the cells of Warrington
From the services at Leicester
To the slums of Northampton

We travel over England
And one day Europe too

Cos we all follow the Swindon
We're the famous Town End crew.
mrverve

Offline Offline

Posts: 1429





Ignore
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 10:20:59 »

Not by itself it won't. Look at Darlington, Pox etc

Your right, It has to be redevolped when we are relatively on the up, not now.

We're a decent sized club in my opinion who could hold our own in The Championship.
Logged
Ralphy

Offline Offline

Posts: 14190





Ignore
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 10:42:58 »

I want a stadium with some sort of unique character about it too. Far too many 'supermarket' style grounds as I call them have been built over the years. You know the sort I mean, 4 small, crap looking little stands and wide open space between each one.

Something like the Galpharm on a smaller scale would do. We shouldn't build a stadium with a smaller capacity than we already have either. I suggest 16,000 with the option to expand.

We shouldn't even consider a ground though until we're out of league 2. Money needs to be invested in the squad.
Logged
Ardiles

Offline Offline

Posts: 11588


Stirlingshire Reds




Ignore
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 10:48:22 »

I want a stadium with some sort of unique character about it too. Far too many 'supermarket' style grounds as I call them have been built over the years. You know the sort I mean, 4 small, crap looking little stands and wide open space between each one.

Oxford's is unique.  Maybe the trick is to make do with 3 stands?  Or we could go one better and build just 2.   Smiley
Logged
ahounsell

Offline Offline

Posts: 233


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 12:07:51 »

As usual it pays to actually read the article to get the full picture. In it,Watkins actually says :

Quote
Relegation should not have an impact on our plans to redevelop because whatever we do with regards to that is all designed to move us closer to that point of financial self-sustainability.

Redevelopment is not and never has been primarily about capacity. It has always been about making the club more self sufficient by generating more income on match days and especially on non match days.

He does then go on to some general musings about how much capacity is required in each league but just because he might say 9,000 would be enough in league two it is a big leap of logic to conclude that the stadium capacity will be chosen on the assumption that we will be playing at that level. Despite all the present doom and gloom, next season will be only the second in the last 25 that we have played in that league.

The reason for the plans being delayed is down to negotiations with potential development partners, the article makes this quite plain. This is most likely down to the current economic situation as much as anything.

The current lease now has less than 2 years to run so something will have to be done within that time frame even if it is just an extension to the existing arrangement.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 16:08:37 »

As usual it pays to actually read the article to get the full picture. In it,Watkins actually says :

Redevelopment is not and never has been primarily about capacity. It has always been about making the club more self sufficient by generating more income on match days and especially on non match days.

He does then go on to some general musings about how much capacity is required in each league but just because he might say 9,000 would be enough in league two it is a big leap of logic to conclude that the stadium capacity will be chosen on the assumption that we will be playing at that level. Despite all the present doom and gloom, next season will be only the second in the last 25 that we have played in that league.

The reason for the plans being delayed is down to negotiations with potential development partners, the article makes this quite plain. This is most likely down to the current economic situation as much as anything.

The current lease now has less than 2 years to run so something will have to be done within that time frame even if it is just an extension to the existing arrangement.

Good post...think the Board came in just about the time of the Banker's induced economic crash. It's very difficult atm to see anyone wishing to invest in a CG project.
Logged
Spencer_White

« Reply #21 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 17:15:06 »

I rekon give it 3 years and the money will be swishing about again at the upper levels.

Love to see a ground suitable for our support, close to the pitch, with stands that are not too steep, where they have really thought about the details (mainly the bars for the fans!).

Even I think the time has come that the club needs the CG to be overhauled and Ive always loved the CG. Maybe thats partly because Ive never trusted any other board weve had in the past to get it right. It was dreadful this season that all but a couple of games had fans on only 3 sides of the ground. The dramatic reduction of season ticket prices from the new regime were really the last chance to make the CG work in its current design.
Logged
Whits
Morphined Up

Offline Offline

Posts: 8136




« Reply #22 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 18:20:06 »

we should do a darlington and go 30,000 all seater with an average crowd of 3,000 Cheesy
Logged

Plays in midfield and his name is Tommy Miller,
signed him from Huddersfield his name is Tommy Miller,
first touch is average but his second is a killer,
heeeeeey Tommy Miller!
Only Me

Offline Offline

Posts: 1202




Ignore
« Reply #23 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 19:35:02 »

I agree we should put things on the back burner, but only until we know the sponsorhip funds then start rebuilding the stands while we are in the bottom division, clearly ensuring there are sufficient funds for the team.  Therefore, most of the building workm will be complete when we are doing well next year then in Division 2 & the Championship.

This together with the money making schemes, e.g. hotel, will increase income then start to improve the stadium facilities for us (god known this is long coming).
Logged
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant

Offline Offline

Posts: 15863




Ignore
« Reply #24 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 20:35:41 »

I agree we should put things on the back burner, but only until we know the sponsorhip funds then start rebuilding the stands while we are in the bottom division, clearly ensuring there are sufficient funds for the team.  Therefore, most of the building workm will be complete when we are doing well next year then in Division 2 & the Championship.

This together with the money making schemes, e.g. hotel, will increase income then start to improve the stadium facilities for us (god known this is long coming).

I agree. I think now is actually the perfect time to really get the ball rolling. Look a team like Swansea. Won promotion from L2 at The Vetch before moving into the Liberty for L1. Crowds then increased and through that they had money for transfers to spend on players which resulted in a stronger squad and eventual promotion. They've now maintained that in The Championship and are now even knocking on the door for top flight football.

Another good example could be Brighton. They're now going up and moving into a new stadium. They've sold 16,000 STs and they will have a solid base to build from.

Of course circumstances at each of those clubs are or were different to us but if we were to challenge next season and hopefully get ourselves back up and the ball has began to roll on redevelopment then it will go with the feel good factor, help atrract players. A club on the up. That's what Brighton are at the moment.

Then again having said all of that it does make financial sense to leave things be at this level. You do have to ask the question though. If the board are really serious about Championship football then the sooner things happen with the CG the better. With the way things are currently if we were to achieve 2 straight promotions we'd really struggle to survive in The Championship and good work would go to waste if we were relegated straight away.
Logged
jonny72

Offline Offline

Posts: 5554





Ignore
« Reply #25 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 21:25:30 »

Everyone is focussing on the capacity of a redeveloped ground, is that really the point? I thought it was to increase revenue away from plain old ticket sales - matchday hospitality, hotels, residential, offices, restaurants, bars, clubs and so on.

Not sure going by our current and past attendances is of much relevance either. A lot of clubs have seen big increases with new stadiums (not sure about redevelopments though) and we'd get a lot more in The Championship nowadays than we did before as it's a bigger and more popular league. We'd have hit 10k this season if we'd been promoted. We'd easily average 15k in The Championship.

But going back to my original point, I don't see the need for anything to be done unless it's increasing revenue in other areas and is going to pay for itself in the long run.
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #26 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 21:51:16 »

Everyone is focussing on the capacity of a redeveloped ground, is that really the point? I thought it was to increase revenue away from plain old ticket sales - matchday hospitality, hotels, residential, offices, restaurants, bars, clubs and so on.
Well, yes. But as we will get one hit at this for about a generation, capacity is clearly also an issue. If we redevelop and don't take the opportunity to either increase capacity or at the least build in the option to easily extend capacity at some future date, we won't get another chance for 25 years+. Which will serve as a very visible statement of our ambition as a club to remain at League One/periodic visits to the lower echelons of the Championship at best, rather than become an established Championship club
Logged
Morgan Freeman

Offline Offline

Posts: 110


People enjoy the sound of my voice




Ignore
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 21:59:24 »

Oxford's is unique.  Maybe the trick is to make do with 3 stands?  Or we could go one better and build just 2.   Smiley

According to this, Pox were interested in buying the east stand from Darlington's old ground Feethams.

http://www.fcbusiness.co.uk/news/article/newsitem=1108/title=farnborough+purchase+quaker%26%23039%3Bs+old+stand


« Last Edit: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 22:02:19 by Morgan Freeman » Logged
leefer

Offline Offline

Posts: 12851





Ignore
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 22:01:22 »

I agree with most of this posted here but Mrverve has hit the nail on the head.

You could say hit a nerve.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: