Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Adver News: Board back Wilson at emergency meeting  (Read 25957 times)
carbonwhite

Offline Offline

Posts: 1939





Ignore
« Reply #60 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 16:52:09 »

Which makes them right.Fwiw it's worth we have alot in common
i can see that  Cheesy
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #61 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 16:55:12 »

there seems alot of moody people on here today, is it nerves for dannys big day tomorrow Fear

Think everybody is a bit pissed off how we've gone from slightly misfiring but playing only a bit shit, to being nailed on relegation certainties, in a matter of 8 or so weeks.

Normally in a relegation season you can see it coming fairly early doors, and there's an obvious reason for it....like being in a league too high....financial meltdown...that sort of thing, but here none of the indicators are there, other than I suppose selling players in the window.

Logged
herthab
TEF Travel

Offline Offline

Posts: 12020





Ignore
« Reply #62 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 16:55:57 »

he has shown time and time again that he cant change a game when its not going our way. he plays people out of position all the time even though the fans have noticed this time and time again he still continues to tinker with the squad.

we achieved the top six finish because he kept the same team playing he hardly ever changed the starting line up. ferry who for some reason cant get a game right now was a massive part of our season last year.
and everyone has seen his subs....

Only 8 players made more than 40 starts last season, after that it was LJF who was next with 31.

Hardly ever changed? Hutchinson made 10 starts, Obadeyi made 11 starts, revell made 9 starts, we even had the likes of Nouble appearing 8 times (3 starts, 5 sub appearances). And all those are just one position!

Last season, we had 27 different players start games for us, this season we've used 25.

He changed personnel last season, FACT. 
Logged

It's All Good..............
flammableBen

« Reply #63 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 16:57:06 »

That's just your opinion herthab.
Logged
herthab
TEF Travel

Offline Offline

Posts: 12020





Ignore
« Reply #64 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 16:58:00 »

That's just your opinion herthab.

Apart from the fact that it's fact, you're right.
Logged

It's All Good..............
flammableBen

« Reply #65 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 16:58:46 »

that's just your opinion too.
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #66 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 17:01:07 »

i can see that  Cheesy
Erm, "it's" is correct as an elision of "it is". The possessive of it is "its", if that's what you meant.

http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-its-and-its.htm

Just thought I'd throw my two-pennorth into the grammar/spelling related fun
Logged
carbonwhite

Offline Offline

Posts: 1939





Ignore
« Reply #67 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 17:01:43 »

Only 8 players made more than 40 starts last season, after that it was LJF who was next with 31.

Hardly ever changed? Hutchinson made 10 starts, Obadeyi made 11 starts, revell made 9 starts, we even had the likes of Nouble appearing 8 times (3 starts, 5 sub appearances). And all those are just one position!

Last season, we had 27 different players start games for us, this season we've used 25.

He changed personnel last season, FACT. 
ok then when we was playing hutchinson, obadeyi and revell we wasnt actually performing well, then we brought in ward and austin who became first team players week in week out.
Logged
herthab
TEF Travel

Offline Offline

Posts: 12020





Ignore
« Reply #68 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 17:02:09 »

that's just your opinion too.

But it's not though is it?

We start every game with 11 players. If DW hadn't of changed personnel last season, we would have 11 players starting every game. As it was, we had a mixture of 27 different players starting games. Therefore DW changed personnel.

It's quite easy to see when you look at it.
Logged

It's All Good..............
carbonwhite

Offline Offline

Posts: 1939





Ignore
« Reply #69 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 17:02:40 »

Erm, "it's" is correct as an elision of "it is". The possessive of it is "its", if that's what you meant.

http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-its-and-its.htm

Just thought I'd throw my two-pennorth into the grammar/spelling related fun
no i meant the FWIW = for whats its worth...... he then put it's worth after fwiw
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #70 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 17:05:01 »

But it's not though is it?

We start every game with 11 players. If DW hadn't of changed personnel last season, we would have 11 players starting every game. As it was, we had a mixture of 27 different players starting games. Therefore DW changed personnel.

It's quite easy to see when you look at it.

I was just winding you up hertha, I shouldn't have really because it's a really interesting point. One which I didn't know.
Logged
Barry Scott

Offline Offline

Posts: 9134




« Reply #71 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 17:05:22 »

hahaha what a cunt what are you a fucking teacher or something? i bet you look through all the posts to see if people have spealt something wrong you fucking old cunt

i could care less if its were or we're now i know its annoying you ill just carry on

As I said, I'm not a grammar nazi and I barely read the forum. I've probably spent an hour on here, total, in the last week and not more than a couple of minutes of that would be reading the wisdom within the forum.

When it's something as fundamental as "we're" being spelt wrong though and it's repeatedly, teaching you can't be a bad thing, because it's simply better. Smiley

It's also, "couldn't care less" unless you're a yank in which case you're still wrong, although you might have grounds for acting like you're right.
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #72 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 17:05:55 »

no i meant the FWIW = for whats its worth...... he then put it's worth after fwiw
Bugger. Good point. I'm having a mare this week. I'll console myself with some minor pedantry over typos in your post when it's perfectly clear what you mean Smiley
Logged
herthab
TEF Travel

Offline Offline

Posts: 12020





Ignore
« Reply #73 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 17:07:28 »

I was just winding you up hertha, I shouldn't have really because it's a really interesting point. One which I didn't know.

I had a feeling you were, but I bit anyway. Bugger.
Logged

It's All Good..............
Don Rogers Shop

« Reply #74 on: Friday, February 11, 2011, 17:08:18 »

I had a feeling you were, but I bit anyway. Bugger.
Stupid cunt.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9   Go Up
Print
Jump to: