Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Right or Wrong  (Read 2659 times)
Sippo
Living in the 80s

Offline Offline

Posts: 15614


I ain't gettin on no plane fool




Ignore
« on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 13:01:16 »

It looks as if Ian Holloway will get a cut of any monies sold if Charlie Adam leaves Blackpool.

Do you agree with this? In a way its a good idea, as if a manager finds a player on the cheap then sells them on for a massive profit surely he deserves a cut? Would you like it if DW received profits from Austin transfer- or was it Fitton that instigated the move intially?
Logged

If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
Sippo
Living in the 80s

Offline Offline

Posts: 15614


I ain't gettin on no plane fool




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 13:02:08 »

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/3373601/Ian-Holloway-will-get-a-cut-of-any-Charlie-Adam-transfer-fee.html
Logged

If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
reeves4england

Offline Offline

Posts: 16121


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 13:03:22 »

If it's written in the contract when he signs then fair enough I say. Plenty of other jobs have financial incentives for good performance, and making the club a few million quid counts as good performance in my book.
Logged
walrus

Offline Offline

Posts: 4228





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 15:51:01 »

Yes, but it should be capped.  If, for arguments sake, Adam signs for Liverpool for £12m and Holloway pockets 25%, that's £4mil away from Blackpool's coffers, which is very unfair.  It also makes the decision of whether or not to sell less clear i.e.: if Charlie Austin was leaving for 2 mil, but Wilson was to pocket £500k, would we be so resigned to sell?

Unfortunately, money leaking out of football into other pockets i.e.: agents is a part of life, but there needs to be strict laws governing it.  When league one football is costing £20 to watch, yet players are netting over and above what they're worth in the real world, it needs to take a good, long, hard look at itself.

Not wanting to harp on about Charlie Austin, but what would he earn in the real world if he was still laying bricks?  He'll now be looking to earn a similar amount in just a week, purely because he can find the back of the net.  It's wrong, but it is so inbed into the sport that it seems impossible to eradicate.
Logged
redbullzeye

Offline Offline

Posts: 1319





Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 15:56:32 »

If it's fair he gets a % when a player is sold for a profit, it must also be fair to deduct a % if he buys someone and Blackpool then sell him on at a thumping loss!  Bet that won't happen though.
Logged
Boeta

Offline Offline

Posts: 3902





Ignore
« Reply #5 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 15:57:03 »

it's probably 5% of the profit - which seems like a good way to run a business to be honest
Logged
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic

Offline Offline

Posts: 4156




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 16:06:51 »

Yes, but it should be capped.  If, for arguments sake, Adam signs for Liverpool for £12m and Holloway pockets 25%, that's £4mil away from Blackpool's coffers, which is very unfair.  It also makes the decision of whether or not to sell less clear i.e.: if Charlie Austin was leaving for 2 mil, but Wilson was to pocket £500k, would we be so resigned to sell?

Unfortunately, money leaking out of football into other pockets i.e.: agents is a part of life, but there needs to be strict laws governing it.  When league one football is costing £20 to watch, yet players are netting over and above what they're worth in the real world, it needs to take a good, long, hard look at itself.

Not wanting to harp on about Charlie Austin, but what would he earn in the real world if he was still laying bricks?  He'll now be looking to earn a similar amount in just a week, purely because he can find the back of the net.  It's wrong, but it is so inbed into the sport that it seems impossible to eradicate.

Well, £3m anyway.
Logged

Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
jonny72

Offline Offline

Posts: 5554





Ignore
« Reply #7 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 16:20:00 »

Nothing wrong with it - provided it's in his contract and done the right way as opposed to back handers. I guess he might be on a lower salary with various performance bonuses like that, best way of paying people and running a business.
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 16:54:02 »

IIRC Mike Newell had a similar deal at Luton
Logged
Sippo
Living in the 80s

Offline Offline

Posts: 15614


I ain't gettin on no plane fool




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 16:54:57 »

I wonder how many other managers have this sort of thing in their contract.

It's nice to see a manager so open and honest for a change.
Logged

If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
bigbobjoylove

Offline Offline

Posts: 4198





Ignore
« Reply #10 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 16:57:14 »

Dennis Wise had a deal where he got a bonus if we got a certain attendance didnt he?
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #11 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 17:01:18 »

I wonder how many other managers have this sort of thing in their contract.
43
Logged
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33884


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #12 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 17:03:12 »

If Holloway has any sense he'd be better off putting the money back into the club. I expect his staying up bonus is worth alot more.
Logged
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic

Offline Offline

Posts: 4156




Ignore
« Reply #13 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 17:05:22 »

Dennis Wise had a deal where he got a bonus if we got a certain attendance didnt he?

I thought that was Ince, but it may have been both of them.
Logged

Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick

Offline Offline

Posts: 16467





Ignore
« Reply #14 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 17:58:43 »

They've just been fined 25 grand for fielding a weakned side against villa, so if Holloways a man of word he should be resigning soon
Logged

Things get better but they never get good
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
Print
Jump to: