adje
 Offline
Posts: 14806
|
 |
« Reply #315 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 20:23:08 » |
|
So Douglas hates McGovern who dislikes Pericard who is not fond of Sheehan who loathes Cuthbert who cant stand Jean-Francois.Who doesn't like OB?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
quot;Molten memories splashing down
upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
|
|
|
carbonwhite
Offline
Posts: 1939
|
|
« Reply #316 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 20:23:46 » |
|
So Douglas hates McGovern who dislikes Pericard who is not fond of Sheehan who loathes Cuthbert who cant stand Jean-Francois.Who doesn't like OB?
everyone |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
König
Offline
Posts: 403
|
|
« Reply #317 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 21:03:47 » |
|
i heard the split is due to disharmony over blackberrys, iphones and nokia 3310s
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #318 on: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 23:45:06 » |
|
So Douglas hates McGovern who dislikes Pericard who is not fond of Sheehan who loathes Cuthbert who cant stand Jean-Francois.Who doesn't like OB?
Crisp can't stand the OB cos they won't let him wear flares. Or something ... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #319 on: Friday, January 28, 2011, 20:22:12 » |
|
Refusing to use agents is one thing but only signing players who are named after countries in the British Empire could be somewhat restrictive. I think there could be a flaw in their plan  I have an old map somewhere....I'd better check it out for clues as to our next signing. Obviously, signing a Jordan and Aden was a coincidence, the plan isn't British Empire, but with Milan Misun signing, place names in general....although hang on, isn't Austin in Texas, or maybe it's Austen which might explain why he was shipped out. We live in STrange times. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arch Stanton
 Online
Posts: 1306
Wallowing in negativity
|
|
« Reply #320 on: Friday, January 28, 2011, 21:09:33 » |
|
No, its definitely Austin, Texas. Now that is spooky Reg, who else is available with a place name for a name?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #321 on: Friday, January 28, 2011, 21:12:24 » |
|
No, its definitely Austin, Texas. Now that is spooky Reg, who else is available with a place name for a name?
Matt Derbyshire would be useful.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #322 on: Friday, January 28, 2011, 21:26:33 » |
|
Jack Wilshere anyone..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27180
|
|
« Reply #323 on: Friday, January 28, 2011, 21:30:22 » |
|
Where's Wilshere?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57746
|
|
« Reply #324 on: Friday, January 28, 2011, 21:33:26 » |
|
Where's Wilshere?
los angeles isn't it? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arch Stanton
Online
Posts: 1306
Wallowing in negativity
|
|
« Reply #325 on: Friday, January 28, 2011, 21:37:09 » |
|
Surely there must be a village called Huddlestone? So perhaps Tom is coming from Tottenham.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
melksham_exile
Offline
Posts: 288
|
|
« Reply #326 on: Friday, January 28, 2011, 21:52:56 » |
|
Strange as this may sound.........I genuinely believe that Austin finally sodding off is gonna do us the world of good. I'm normally the worlds most pesimistic cunt but we got into that horrible rut of trying to play everything through one striker. It was painfully evident at Rovers that without hoping he could conjour anything around the box the rest of the team didn't offer much at all (even when JP scored Austin looked like he wanted to take it off his toe). We all thought we were doomed when Cox went too but we weren't and i think where we differed last season compared to any in recent times is that we had two forwards firing on all cylinders and to be fare, that's fucking rare for us! I've got a really good feeling that tomorrow our midfielders will take more responsibility getting forward and our underperforming strikers will play with a bit less of a 'can I pass to Charlie' attitude and just get on with the business of shooting. A confidence boosting 3-0...........you heard it here first.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #327 on: Friday, January 28, 2011, 21:56:24 » |
|
Strange as this may sound.........I genuinely believe that Austin finally sodding off is gonna do us the world of good. I'm normally the worlds most pesimistic cunt but we got into that horrible rut of trying to play everything through one striker. It was painfully evident at Rovers that without hoping he could conjour anything around the box the rest of the team didn't offer much at all (even when JP scored Austin looked like he wanted to take it off his toe). We all thought we were doomed when Cox went too but we weren't and i think where we differed last season compared to any in recent times is that we had two forwards firing on all cylinders and to be fare, that's fucking rare for us! I've got a really good feeling that tomorrow our midfielders will take more responsibility getting forward and our underperforming strikers will play with a bit less of a 'can I pass to Charlie' attitude and just get on with the business of shooting. A confidence boosting 3-0...........you heard it here first.
Ditto, except I'm normally half full. But I genuinely believe that was a turning point today, good as he's been, we became rather limited and easy(ish) to stop most of the time. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #328 on: Friday, January 28, 2011, 22:03:55 » |
|
I would agree, but Exeter are a good footballing side.
One of the best down here last season.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #329 on: Friday, January 28, 2011, 22:06:19 » |
|
Pericard is back tomorow..................last chance to shine?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
