Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27180
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: Friday, November 12, 2010, 14:41:14 » |
|
Massive whooshes all round.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
land_of_bo
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: Friday, November 12, 2010, 16:18:13 » |
|
 Magic - I know it's "you're" but Paul wrote "write" instead of right, so I thought he might as well have used "your" as well to complete the illiteracy. Where is the whooooooosh smiley?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: Friday, November 12, 2010, 16:23:15 » |
|
 Magic - I know it's "you're" but Paul wrote "write" instead of right, so I thought he might as well have used "your" as well to complete the illiteracy. Where is the whooooooosh smiley? *wush
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57749
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: Monday, July 23, 2012, 20:34:53 » |
|
Surely the fact that he is now Training with Fleetwood just means he is out of the QPR door.
Certain tabloids are playing the "possible loan move" card. No chance.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
 |
« Reply #34 on: Monday, July 23, 2012, 20:36:44 » |
|
Barton's quality, would love to see him at the CG one day.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DRS
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: Monday, July 23, 2012, 20:45:06 » |
|
Surely the fact that he is now Training with Fleetwood just means he is out of the QPR door.
Certain tabloids are playing the "possible loan move" card. No chance.
Wouldn't rule it out at all. A loan at fleetwood would see his 12 match loan finished alot quicker
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
singingiiiffy
Offline
Posts: 2911
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: Monday, July 23, 2012, 21:32:09 » |
|
Wouldn't rule it out at all. A loan at fleetwood would see his 12 match loan finished alot quicker
heard this mentioned as well. Could QPR loan him to fleetwood whilst still paying his wages in full then as soon as he is finished his ban take him back without him actually playing for them?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DRS
|
 |
« Reply #37 on: Monday, July 23, 2012, 21:34:01 » |
|
heard this mentioned as well. Could QPR loan him to fleetwood whilst still paying his wages in full then as soon as he is finished his ban take him back without him actually playing for them?
If he was sold that would be the case so wouldn't rule out it not being possible on a loan deal.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57749
|
 |
« Reply #38 on: Monday, July 23, 2012, 21:37:49 » |
|
Interesting slant. Hadn't thought of that.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RedRag
Offline
Posts: 3501
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: Monday, July 23, 2012, 21:39:34 » |
|
heard this mentioned as well. Could QPR loan him to fleetwood whilst still paying his wages in full then as soon as he is finished his ban take him back without him actually playing for them?
very good point - because if the "knobhead" did in fact play, he would probably get another ban
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: Monday, July 23, 2012, 21:48:54 » |
|
I thought he was being offload to a Championship club, can't remember who it was but someone was interested.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DRS
|
 |
« Reply #41 on: Tuesday, July 24, 2012, 15:33:34 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
singingiiiffy
Offline
Posts: 2911
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: Tuesday, July 24, 2012, 15:44:20 » |
|
I thought he was being offload to a Championship club, can't remember who it was but someone was interested.
shef wed said they would take him. interesting that the fa would have to approve any loan and the transfer of his ban. considering the bbc headline 'QPR consider Joey Barton loan to speed up 12-match ban' i think the fa would oppose it outright.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jimmy Glass is an Alien
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: Tuesday, July 24, 2012, 15:53:07 » |
|
shef wed said they would take him. interesting that the fa would have to approve any loan and the transfer of his ban. considering the bbc headline 'QPR consider Joey Barton loan to speed up 12-match ban' i think the fa would oppose it outright.
They may do, but if you loan somebody out does it have to be for a minimum period. i.e 6 months like the Cox transfer?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bigbobjoylove
Offline
Posts: 4198
|
 |
« Reply #44 on: Thursday, August 16, 2012, 21:48:57 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|