Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
 Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #180 on: Monday, November 29, 2010, 18:43:27 » |
|
Are the Aussies really that bad? I mean 517-1......seriously?  ?? Hahaha. Shame we only got 1 wicket in reply as I reckon another 2 or 3 and they may have even collapsed and lost the game. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Coca Fola
|
|
« Reply #181 on: Monday, November 29, 2010, 23:23:57 » |
|
Cricket - yawn.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16467
|
|
« Reply #182 on: Monday, November 29, 2010, 23:25:46 » |
|
Bit like your posts
ZING
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
|
Coca Fola
|
|
« Reply #183 on: Monday, November 29, 2010, 23:26:07 » |
|
Bit like your posts
ZING
Bravo.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16118
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #184 on: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 00:18:45 » |
|
Are the Aussies really that bad? I mean 517-1......seriously? ?? Hahaha. Shame we only got 1 wicket in reply as I reckon another 2 or 3 and they may have even collapsed and lost the game. Unfortunately, whilst we made 517-1 in this innings, there was an innings before it in which we were less than impressive ourselves! That said, if we can play properly in the 2nd test you've got to fancy our chances now! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Benzel
Offline
Posts: 6157
|
|
« Reply #185 on: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 11:26:00 » |
|
I know fuck all about cricket. I don't mind watching a bit but how can we only draw at 517-1?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Is your cat making too much noise all the time?
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16118
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #186 on: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 12:07:49 » |
|
I know fuck all about cricket. I don't mind watching a bit but how can we only draw at 517-1?
England 260 all out and 517-1 (declared) Australia 481 all out and 107-1 We needed to get Australia all out for less than 296 to win, but only got one man out, hence a draw |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Benzel
Offline
Posts: 6157
|
|
« Reply #187 on: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 12:15:24 » |
|
But England's 2 scores add up to more?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Is your cat making too much noise all the time?
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #188 on: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 12:25:28 » |
|
But England's 2 scores add up to more?
But the game ran out of time, so it's a draw, and we more onto the next match. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #189 on: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 12:29:34 » |
|
You need to bowl the other side out twice (ie take 20 wickets) to win a game of cricket. It's as fundamental as the rule that says to win a game of football you have to score more goals than the other side.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Christy
Offline
Posts: 389
|
|
« Reply #190 on: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 12:44:19 » |
|
You need to bowl the other side out twice (ie take 20 wickets) to win a game of cricket. It's as fundamental as the rule that says to win a game of football you have to score more goals than the other side.
Except it's not, as you could win a test match without taking any wickets, or even take 19 less and still win.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Benzel
Offline
Posts: 6157
|
|
« Reply #191 on: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 12:45:08 » |
|
Ah see, I figured scoring more runs was even more fundamentaler.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Is your cat making too much noise all the time?
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16118
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #192 on: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 12:57:30 » |
|
Ah see, I figured scoring more runs was even more fundamentaler.
Nope. Otherwise there would potentially be very little incentive for the side who bats first to do anything other than defend for 5 days, especially on a good batting wicket. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16467
|
|
« Reply #193 on: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 13:41:27 » |
|
Except it's not, as you could win a test match without taking any wickets, or even take 19 less and still win....
Have i missed something blatantly obvious? AS this doesn't make sense |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #194 on: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 13:45:05 » |
|
I guess if the other team decalred a score in the first innings without loss, your team registers a score (all out) and then the other team beats that without losing a wicket.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
