This bitch is making me so angry

[BANGKOK RED]

Right now I feel as though I want to batter the fuck out of the dumb bitch cunt, and I haven't even finished the first part yet. How could somebody genuinely be that fucking thick?

Do her Dawkins.

[Batch]

She is indeed just thick as shit/brainwashed. Its a shame that such stupid views will get passed down to their children but its best laughed at by the rest of us sane people. As long as the only exposure that my children get to this drivel is in RE that's OK by me. Its when people try and get it taught as a science that narks me off.

Mind you, to me that's like any religion. I find a lot of religion a bit stupid. Creationism doesn't make me as angry as idiot Jehovah's Witness who deny their own life saving blood transfusions, based purely on one interpretation of a 2000 year old relic of a book that even if genuine has probably been mistranslated many many times from its original form.

[shady]

Let me guess, straw man argument?

[shady]

Just watched that, did you watch the same clip as me, she floored him, he's clearly edgey and uncomfortable. Massive credit to her, whoever she is, for going toe-to-toe and delivering a very cogent argument.

 As for your comment:

Last sentence: 'How could somebody genuinely be that fucking thick?'

First sentence; 'Right now I feel as though I want to batter the fuck out of the dumb bitch cunt'

Oh dear, oh very dear indeed! Evoloution? 

[ron dodgers]

he lost the plot - go back to Popper - "science can be refuted"
That's the point, by experiment , not belief - her description was invalid
derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

"very cogent argument"
 let's discuss

[BANGKOK RED]

Could a mod please check shady's ip. Methinks we have a troll, quite possibly a reincarnation of one that has been previously killed.

[BANGKOK RED]

he lost the plot - go back to Popper - "science can be refuted"
That's the point, by experiment , not belief - her description was invalid
derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Science constantly looks to refute science.

[Batch]

Massive credit to her, whoever she is, for going toe-to-toe and delivering a very cogent argument.

But her argument seemed to consist of "there is no evidence for evolution", and then refusing to listen to the fact there was.

[BANGKOK RED]

Really.

Watch Dawkins about half way through the second part. I am convinced that he was about to deck her.

[4D]

What is she "concerned" about?

[BANGKOK RED]

She is utterly ignorant to the most basic principle's of science.

Dawkin's has even argues that high ranking Bishop's and other religious figures agree with evolution. She's just stupid.

[Ginginho]

She is an idiot with an extremely punchable face and he looks a bit like Fitton.

[BANGKOK RED]

She keeps on saying that there wo

[shady]

Bangkok, I repeat:

As for your comment:

Last sentence: 'How could somebody genuinely be that fucking thick?'

First sentence; 'Right now I feel as though I want to batter the fuck out of the dumb bitch cunt'

Oh dear, oh very dear indeed! Evoloution? 

-- What a completely cretinous comment, maybe you should embrace evoloution a little more because you clearly are a neanderthal throw-back, advocating violence against a woman.

[shady]

Could a mod please check shady's ip. Methinks we have a troll, quite possibly a reincarnation of one that has been previously killed.

 As for that, don't be a twerp.