|
nochee
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 15:29:46 » |
|
He is. If he leaves they're giving someone else in exchange.
How would that work if the sponsor money has already been used on Ball? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spy
 Offline
Posts: 2483
|
|
« Reply #46 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 15:31:38 » |
|
Well TEF have paid a years worth of sponsorship money so would be given another player that is free. If no one was free they'd be given the next new player.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #47 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 21:25:47 » |
|
How about just sponsoring a player for the season....stupid sponsoring loan player in my opinion...hes not even a Swindon player....he gets an injury he will be back to City.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #48 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 21:42:55 » |
|
we were going to Leefer dont forget.
It was put to the vote and that's what the TEF wanted.
Could not vote as I was away but the result is fine with me
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
joteddyred
Offline
Posts: 4363
|
|
« Reply #49 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 21:54:47 » |
|
I have also just returned from holiday, so didn't vote either. I'm with Leefer on this one though, I would have preferred it to have been a permanent player rather than a loan one, but never mind. I certainly won't be moaning if he bangs thre goals in!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33875
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #50 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 22:01:24 » |
|
Ball is going to be quality.
If you aren't happy with us sponsoring a loan plauer feel free to take up your issue with Cunting Gr££r.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #51 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 22:10:55 » |
|
Ball is going to be quality.
If you aren't happy with us sponsoring a loan plauer feel free to take up your issue with Cunting Greer.
Why? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #52 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 22:18:16 » |
|
Ball is going to be quality.
If you aren't happy with us sponsoring a loan plauer feel free to take up your issue with Cunting Greer.
you need to let it go Dave..................its done, he's gone Dont be so bitter x |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33875
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #53 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 22:24:32 » |
|
Why? because otherwise we'd be sponsoring a Town player.
You'd be the expert on letting things go, wouldn't you fred?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
Offline
Posts: 23568
|
|
« Reply #54 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 22:31:43 » |
|
I'm just surprised nobody's moaned about the apostrophe missing from his new name yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #55 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 22:42:39 » |
|
Why? because otherwise we'd be sponsoring a Town player.
You'd be the expert on letting things go, wouldn't you fred?
Jesus Dan, why so angry ? OK Greer, in your eyes shit on us. None of us will ever know the real reasons or the chain of events that led up to the departure, so why let it fester ? The squad is shaping up nicely and you should be full of optimism rather than what you are portraying at the moment. With regard to the sponsorship, it was voted upon and that is who the consensus wanted to sponsor. That's good enough for me mate As for your closing coment ........................ so fucking what ? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33875
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #56 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 22:50:29 » |
|
No one actually bothers to read my posts properly anyway.
I've been quite positive about our squad recently but once you've been labled that's it...
He shit on us and we haven't replaced him though. Shouldn't take a rocket scientist to work that one out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #57 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 22:55:19 » |
|
In your eyes he does
If, in Danny's eyes he does, then he will be.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nochee
|
|
« Reply #58 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 23:03:30 » |
|
we were going to Leefer dont forget.
It was put to the vote and that's what the TEF wanted.
Could not vote as I was away but the result is fine with me
Well, the vote only seemed to be open for 1 hour 12 mins before it was accepted as Ball. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #59 on: Friday, July 30, 2010, 23:06:55 » |
|
Well, the vote only seemed to be open for 1 hour 12 mins before it was accepted as Ball.
Nochee, cant really comment as I was in Egypt, but all I was saying was if the majority wanted to go with Ball (as it seemed) then I was fine with it |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
