|
|
Colin Todd
 Offline
Posts: 3318
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: Friday, June 4, 2010, 15:47:10 » |
|
meh
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Friday, June 4, 2010, 15:49:42 » |
|
I signed it, for what little its worth. But then I'll sign anything  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Talk Talk
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Friday, June 4, 2010, 17:11:03 » |
|
I signed it, for what little its worth. But then I'll sign anything You didn't sign the "Forest Not Stadium" petition. :cunt: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wiggy
Whippet fancying, T-shirt flogging cunt
Offline
Posts: 2612
Whippet Fancier
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Friday, June 4, 2010, 17:13:57 » |
|
Salisbury could be in worse doo-doo than they think. Apparently, the new owners went to a council consultation on possible development land recently and inquired about the RayMac site being considered for housing development.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Thank [insert deity of choice] for beer and peanuts
|
|
|
THE FLASH
Offline
Posts: 9602
Quick as a Flash!
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Friday, June 4, 2010, 17:41:25 » |
|
Who will my old man go and watch now!!???
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Clems Army!
|
|
|
|
RedWeston
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Friday, June 4, 2010, 20:04:58 » |
|
This is the FA Picking on the small club
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Crispy
Pink Jumper For Goalpost
Offline
Posts: 3066
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Friday, June 4, 2010, 21:31:25 » |
|
Rather them than us.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
They've got muslamic rayguns, muslamic rayguns..
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Friday, June 4, 2010, 21:47:11 » |
|
Don't underestimate how harsh officials are within Non-League, they're not very tolerant.
I'd be very surprised win this battle goes well for Salisbury.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RedWeston
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Saturday, June 5, 2010, 08:29:27 » |
|
Rather them than us.
It was us back in 1990 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
china red
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Saturday, June 5, 2010, 08:43:42 » |
|
I like Forest Green Rovers but it would be seriously unfair on Salisbury if they were relegated two divisions for the financial mess the previous board got them into. Salisbury had a really good season this year, but for the points deduction they would have finished 6th in the BSP. Not bad for a small team from Wiltshire.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Saturday, June 5, 2010, 08:50:55 » |
|
We've been in trouble several times since 1990, bigger trouble and nobody wanted to know about Swindon. That's the bitter version of events I have anyway.
I've said it before, I'll sign petitions and put a couple of quid in a bucket but realistically what more can I/we do?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Saturday, June 5, 2010, 10:35:38 » |
|
This is the FA Picking on the small club
It's nothing to do with the FA (read the start of the thread), it's the Conference applying their own rules to the absolute letter, devoid of any common sense or regard for the circumstances. Though how they do this to Salisbury when they were quite happy to let the Vaughans continue to wreck Chester all last season in flagrant breach of both Conference and FA regs is wholly beyond rational explanation. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oxford_fan
Offline
Posts: 6764
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Saturday, June 5, 2010, 14:12:11 » |
|
The Conference is a mess, Brian Lee and whoever else run it are doing a terrible job. Nobody down there trusts the administration, due to their continued cock ups and bias throughout the years.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12832
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Saturday, June 5, 2010, 18:16:52 » |
|
It was us back in 1990
To be fair to Crispy, that was before he was born. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
