Line up for Wycombe

[One F In Fitton]

The positive thing is that we've got options, players on the Judy Dench who can come on and affect a game. I agree that Ward & Ferry may have lost a little of their spark, JPM is flexible, Kev can do some serious damage down the right flank, Darby looks like he may have recently been told to try & influence things more on the attacking front, I am hopeful that LJF can produce something big for us, Marshall can make things happen. I quite like Easton & Timlin, but if it's one of those with JD in the middle then I worry about the collective lack of creativity/goals in there.

The keeper, c/b's, JD & front 2 are a no-brainer, but there are interesting decisions for Wilson to make elsewhere.

[axs]

I'd change to bring in big Kev and Lecs, or just throw everything at them and go three up front.

[Bogus Dave]

I'd stick Smith up front

They'd be expecting all of your suggestions fools

[Nijholts Nuts]

I think that Wycombe are going to come at us, they've got just as much to play for as we have, being 5 points short of safety. To that end, defensively speaking, I think Darby should start and maybe give big Kev a run out if we take a lead in the first half, maybe even bring him on at half time. I think Sheehan seems a little jaded, def agree with the comment above about him not looking the same after injury.

[Iffy's Onion Bhaji]

I think Darby should start away from home tbh. In saying that i'd love to see us just go for 2nd now so Manks wouldn't be a bad option in that respect.

[Don Rogers Shop]

Teams have figured us in general recently, but not JPM individually, he's still creating and getting forward, so he's a definate starter, we'd be weaker without him.

I actually think the fact Jpm has been getting more of the ball recently is due to teams doubling up on ward.Jpm has been superb but i would like to see him roaming a bit more inside and have someone with pace on the right which allows ward more space.

[THE FLASH]

Start Wanky and put Marshall on the bench.

In the playoffs for sure...got to go for it!

[reeves4england]

I'd like to see things mixed up a bit but I can't see it happening, it will be the same 11 against Wycombe. It's not like we've actually played that badly over the last few matches, just been unluckly, so for that reason I don't reckon Wilson will change it.

Well, we were distinctly average against Walsall. I don't see Wilson making huge changes. Amankwaah in would be nice but apart from that I don't see much need to change it. As many have said, Wycombe need the points so can't play 10 at the back like Exeter did.

[DV]

If Wycombe take the lead you can bet your life it will be 10 men behind the ball...

[reeves4england]

If Wycombe take the lead you can bet your life it will be 10 men behind the ball...

Yes, but if you let a team whose most potent striking force is Alex Revell go 1-0 up against you, then you don't deserve automatic promotion.

[DV]

You could say the same about Exeter and Walsall.

Hardly the divisions most potent teams.

[Simon Pieman]

You could say the same about Exeter and Walsall.

Hardly the divisions most potent teams.

But we lost due to shitty defensive errors. I think the point is, you can't get autos if you do that.

[juddie]

but we're not the only ones making mistakes...

We're guarenteed a play-off place, so I reckon we go all out attack and try and get our noses in front.

[Talk Talk]

This.

With us now guarenteed with a play off place then we might as well go hell for leather at Wycombe.  Personally I would bring in Amankwaah to give that little bit more going forward with his link up play and overlapping with McGovern.

lucas

amnkwaah
germaine
cuthers
sheezle

ferry mcgovern
dougie
easton

ward
austin
paynter

balls out time, three up top.

[Crozzer]

Lucas
Manky
Greer
Cutthroat
JFL
JPM
Douglas
Ferry
Marshall
Paynter
What's His Name

Subs from:
Smith
Darby
Ward
Easton
Pericard
The West Ham Geezer
Sheahan
Morrison
Timlin