|
DMR
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 17:29:47 » |
|
Although they're both shit anyway, you're most probably right  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
 Offline
Posts: 12832
|
|
« Reply #46 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 17:49:03 » |
|
My sister works at the Old Bank
Where is this "old bank?" |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #47 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 19:23:17 » |
|
My cardif supporting housemate says he's shite
My Swansea City mate said Amankwah was shite,he was for them....not sure about Comminges really,good tryer,skilfull but very frail....but lets be honest its some squad ware gradually putting together. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #48 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 19:35:21 » |
|
Where is this "old bank?"
Opposite the Goddard Arms in old town....it was a bank for years the last one being Barclays i believe..nice building so its bound to be down for demolition very soon! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #49 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 20:43:15 » |
|
Opposite the Goddard Arms in old town....it was a bank for years the last one being Barclays i believe..nice building so its bound to be down for demolition very soon!
Nat West...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ronnie21
Offline
Posts: 6154
The Mighty Hankerton
|
|
« Reply #50 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 21:26:57 » |
|
Opposite the Goddard Arms in old town....it was a bank for years the last one being Barclays i believe..nice building so its bound to be down for demolition very soon!
In Wood Street, by McKenzies and of course Reg was right, it was formerly a Nat West. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Frigby Daser
Offline
Posts: 4173
|
|
« Reply #51 on: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 22:36:25 » |
|
Quite randomly, was thinking how useful he'd be to have back yesterday. Provides cover on both sides, at full back and on then wings. Would be a very astute signing.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spy
Offline
Posts: 2483
|
|
« Reply #52 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 08:46:54 » |
|
If he was back he'd be in our first team and I don't think he'd drop a league unless he thought he would be in the first team.
McKensies is definitely shit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic
Offline
Posts: 4156
|
|
« Reply #53 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 12:35:48 » |
|
If he was back he'd be in our first team Who gets dropped then ? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
|
|
|
Spy
Offline
Posts: 2483
|
|
« Reply #54 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 12:41:29 » |
|
Who gets dropped then ?
JFL. If Comminges can play there. Is Comminges left back or right back? Left I think... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic
Offline
Posts: 4156
|
|
« Reply #55 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 12:43:54 » |
|
JFL. If Comminges can play there. Is Comminges left back or right back? Left I think...
But surely Sheehan is our first team left back ? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
|
|
|
Spy
Offline
Posts: 2483
|
|
« Reply #56 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 12:46:04 » |
|
Comminges was better. I'd play him head of Sheehan. Obviously not immediately but ease him in. Off the bench first.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
|
« Reply #57 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 12:47:34 » |
|
Comminges is not better than sheehan imo.I don't think it's been picked up on but big Kev seems to be carrying a bit of a knock recently so maybe he could give him a couple of games rest.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Highland Robin
|
|
« Reply #58 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 12:51:41 » |
|
DW quoted as saying he might be a target, but not top of the list
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
carbonwhite
Offline
Posts: 1939
|
|
« Reply #59 on: Friday, February 12, 2010, 20:13:07 » |
|
he played right back so i shudnt think it would effect sheehan
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
