Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: If the games were 85 minutes long...  (Read 6796 times)
Doore

« Reply #15 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:06:50 »

I think the stats clearly show we have a problem...of interest is what's to be done about it?

Wake up Reg, we've covered that - we're going to play 85 minute games. 
Logged
thepeoplesgame

Offline Offline

Posts: 666




Ignore
« Reply #16 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:07:46 »

Exeter was paint pot.

We definitely conceded a late equaliser in the league game because I saw it happen. And I wasn't at the Paint Pot match.

For what it's worth, which ain't much.
Logged
iffy

« Reply #17 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:09:24 »

All it shows is that we have a problem with late goals.
I wrote a long answer to this but I've deleted it as there was clearly no point attempting to explain to you what you've done wrong here. To have such a stunning ability with stats you would have to be shadow home secretary. Well done.

1. Do we have a problem conceding late goals? Yes
2. Is this costing us league points? Yes
3. Is it frustrating to be sitting on a one-goal lead with no confidence that the team can hold it? Yes

I don't see why everyone's being weird about this. If we conceded lots of goals from set-pieces or gave away a lot of penalties then that would be the thing to work on. We don't. We're conceding them late. Is it fitness, concentration, shape, the other team going for it? Who knows. But to pretend it's not a fact is just odd.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #18 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:11:25 »

Wake up Reg, we've covered that - we're going to play 85 minute games. 

Reg likes  this Thumb

We need to invent some ultra strong tractor beam type thing, that can drag the ref's watch hand back 5 mins.

It's a shame fB left the TEF, as it would have given him something to do.
Logged
reeves4england

Offline Offline

Posts: 16121


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #19 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:11:29 »

All it shows is that we have a problem with late goals.
1. Do we have a problem conceding late goals? Yes
2. Is this costing us league points? Yes
3. Is it frustrating to be sitting on a one-goal lead with no confidence that the team can hold it? Yes

I don't see why everyone's being weird about this. If we conceded lots of goals from set-pieces or gave away a lot of penalties then that would be the thing to work on. We don't. We're conceding them late. Is it fitness, concentration, shape, the other team going for it? Who knows. But to pretend it's not a fact is just odd.
Exactly. As much as you try to rip these stats apart, they DO show something and they DO justify iffy's point. He's not saying we deserve to be above Charlton, or that we should be above them, but that there is an issue preventing us from being above them. An issue which relly does need to be sorted out.
Logged
thepeoplesgame

Offline Offline

Posts: 666




Ignore
« Reply #20 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:13:09 »

Reg likes  this Thumb

We need to invent some ultra strong tractor beam type thing, that can drag the ref's watch hand back 5 mins.

It's a shame fB left the TEF, as it would have given him something to do.

Forward five minutes, surely?
Logged
Doore

« Reply #21 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:14:59 »

No-one is pretending we don't concede late goals - I think we all agree its a problem.  People don't see the point in a make believe league table showing how it would look if [insert bizarre and inconsistent made up rule here].

If the table was decided on a rolling alpabetical basis beginning at S, we'd be 4th.
Logged
iffy

« Reply #22 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:26:06 »

No-one is pretending we don't concede late goals - I think we all agree its a problem.  People don't see the point in a make believe league table showing how it would look if [insert bizarre and inconsistent made up rule here].

If the table was decided on a rolling alpabetical basis beginning at S, we'd be 4th.

We've been fucking amazing this season. The first 40 minutes against Charlton were amazing.

But we panic like schoolboys for the last 5-10 minutes in games that we haven't put away.

The point of the table was to show that we'd be borderline automatic promotion with games in hand if this wasn't a problem.

I'm sorry I used hypothetical "numbers" to make this point. This has clearly confused and upset people. I am very sorry. In future I will revert to the far more constructive "FUCK OFF TWAT".
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #23 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:26:24 »

Forward five minutes, surely?

Don't call me Shirley.  I still have problems with the clocks going back or forward, after all the years I've been subjected to it. There's probably some name for a mental block about clock changing....whatever it is I've got it.
Logged
BANGKOK RED

« Reply #24 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:28:19 »

Reg likes  this Thumb

We need to invent some ultra strong tractor beam type thing, that can drag the ref's watch hand back 5 mins.

It's a shame fB left the TEF, as it would have given him something to do.

What if it is a digital watch though?
Logged
Doore

« Reply #25 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:32:45 »



In future I will revert to the far more constructive "FUCK OFF TWAT".

Don't do that, no-one listens to jayohaitchenn. 
Logged
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER

Offline Offline

Posts: 12834




« Reply #26 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:37:08 »

Caught me on a bad day, but my point (However bluntly i put it) stands.
Logged
iffy

« Reply #27 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:42:23 »

Caught me on a bad day, but my point (However bluntly i put it) stands.

FUCK OFF TWAT.
Logged
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER

Offline Offline

Posts: 12834




« Reply #28 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:45:00 »

Cheesy
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #29 on: Monday, February 8, 2010, 17:45:23 »

What if it is a digital watch though?

Good point, then we need something like a laser to speed up the piezoelectric vibrations in the quartz...
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
Print
Jump to: