Miss Angry
Offline
Posts: 1385
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: Friday, February 5, 2010, 19:04:43 » |
|
Dunno what made me think you did?! It my sons first choice school i was being nosey
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: Friday, February 5, 2010, 19:10:50 » |
|
Isambard?
Sounds like a capital city of some M. Eastern country.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Miss Angry
Offline
Posts: 1385
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: Friday, February 5, 2010, 19:13:26 » |
|
the school uniform is "Gold" - not to be confused with bumble bee yellow
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic
Offline
Posts: 4156
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: Friday, February 5, 2010, 22:03:25 » |
|
Isambard?
Sounds like a capital city of some M. Eastern country.
That's staggeringly ignorant BR. (or not at all funny if that's what you were trying for)
|
|
|
Logged
|
Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #34 on: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 06:25:19 » |
|
Ha,
I've just googled it and realise what a dumb twat I was.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
herthab
TEF Travel
Offline
Posts: 12020
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 09:17:46 » |
|
Isambard - Islamabad.
Easy mistake to make. Did Brunel have a brother?
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 12:01:25 » |
|
i think its pretty common knowledge that the ginger lad wanst exactly just a innocent victim, atho a hammer attack is a tad harsh!
Really?! How's that? Do you know Henry Webster personally, or did some bloke tell you this 9th hand in a pub? If you're going to make statements like that, at least have the balls to back them up with something substantive. (You may be right, by the way. But spreading unsubstantiated rumours, and hiding behind an internet user name while you do it, seems pretty poor to me.)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dozno9
|
 |
« Reply #37 on: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 12:16:49 » |
|
The court statement from the prosecution said in court:
Describing the day of the attack in January last year, James Patrick, prosecuting, said a fight was arranged after Henry had "barged" into a group of boys in a school corridor. Mr Patrick added: "It was to be a fair fight. A one on one - or so Henry thought. But he had not reckoned on the fact it was not to be one on one."
I think if the prosecution states that a fight between the two was arranged then he wasn't an innocent party as the statement above reads, Henry barged into the group. He picked on the wrong person.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #38 on: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 12:30:37 » |
|
i've heard that the asians were in a gang(self titled asian invasion) at the school and webster stood up to them.he may have barged into them but this was simmering for a while prior to the attack allegedly.apparantly he was taunted by them for being ginger.
that said,whatever reason it was arranged is irrelivant.fights like the one webster thought he was going to have happen every day in schools. for a mob of asians to drive into the school unchallenged,and do what they did, is a fucking dirgrace.
|
|
« Last Edit: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 12:35:19 by arriba »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 12:42:42 » |
|
For a mob of Asians? Would it have been OK for a Mob of Caucasians to drive into the school then?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 12:46:59 » |
|
no. a mob of asians they were though.
|
|
« Last Edit: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 12:57:19 by arriba »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
 |
« Reply #41 on: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 12:56:21 » |
|
So basically, two parties spoiling for a school playground fight. One of the parties pulls out a hammer and smashes it against the skull of the other. That makes the kid on the receiving end very much an 'innocent victim' in my book. The attack was completely disproportionate.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hammer
Offline
Posts: 390
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 13:04:04 » |
|
no. a mob of asians they were though.
Furthermore, Asians don't normally subscribe to the 'one on one' scenario as Mr Webster found out to his cost.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 13:07:23 » |
|
So basically, two parties spoiling for a school playground fight. One of the parties pulls out a hammer and smashes it against the skull of the other. That makes the kid on the receiving end very much an 'innocent victim' in my book. The attack was completely disproportionate.
there were blokes in their twenties involved in this.13 people were convicted. plenty of articles on what did happen are online.google, henry webster attack.
|
|
« Last Edit: Saturday, February 6, 2010, 13:13:49 by arriba »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
herthab
TEF Travel
Offline
Posts: 12020
|
 |
« Reply #44 on: Sunday, February 7, 2010, 09:16:15 » |
|
Furthermore, Asians don't normally subscribe to the 'one on one' scenario as Mr Webster found out to his cost.
I think you mean scumbag chavvy cunts don't suscribe to the 'one on one' scenario. There's just as many (If not more) gangs of white scummy twats (As I can personally testify to). This could have happened if it was a group of white lads against another white lad, just because they were asian it doesn't make it a racially motivated attack.
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
|