|
Don Rogers Shop
|
 |
« Reply #105 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 15:31:15 » |
|
I think people are forgetting that Paynter if he moves is likely to get a fairly decent signing on fee.Like it or not i am sure that will have something to do with it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Power to people
 Offline
Posts: 6582
|
|
« Reply #106 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 15:49:28 » |
|
If Wilson did not think that Paynter was good enough for us in the chumpsship then I don't think he would be offered a new contract let alone Wilson & Fitton be willing to make him the highest earner.
I think we can safely say that Billy will still be here at 1701 on 1 Feb when the window closes
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic
Offline
Posts: 4156
|
|
« Reply #107 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 16:00:05 » |
|
I think people are forgetting that Paynter if he moves is likely to get a fairly decent signing on fee.Like it or not i am sure that will have something to do with it
He might get a signing on fee here if he agrees to his new contract. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
|
|
|
Barry Scott
Offline
Posts: 9134
|
|
« Reply #108 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 16:12:58 » |
|
paynter holds the aces here.we dont know what he earns here,what the new contract offer is,or what rovers are offering him.
if he can get a longer deal, on more money, then he may well want to go.
I also note a Wovers bid hasn't been confirmed anywhere or by anyone. I think this is just a journo reading rumours then adding weight to it to create something that looks like news. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #109 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 16:13:36 » |
|
I think we can safely say that Billy will still be here at 1701 on 1 Feb when the window closes
Well you've jinxed that good and proper now then |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #110 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 16:41:36 » |
|
...this, this isn't really happening is it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Langers
Offline
Posts: 4240
|
|
« Reply #111 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 17:40:47 » |
|
I bloody hope not.
If he were to move to Rovers for the money, he wouldnt be liked very much....
But not only that, why would we sell our top scorer? Yes its money for someone who is out of contract in the summer but imo he is important for us.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #112 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 17:46:13 » |
|
I also note a Wovers bid hasn't been confirmed anywhere or by anyone. I think this is just a journo reading rumours then adding weight to it to create something that looks like news.
Spot on i reckon. In the league paper this week they had us having a 100k bid rejected by Crawley, when everyone bar the twat that wrote that know's it's Crawleys valuation, all journalists are lazy fuckers and dont bother to check if anythings correct. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Stef Troll
Offline
Posts: 3161
|
|
« Reply #113 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 18:02:16 » |
|
Take the money and run is my opinion.
Hes having a good season atm, but i fear he is a one season wonder (ie like Ricketts of Bolton before he played for England). His goal scoring record to date is one goal every 4 and a half matches. Not prolific by any means
Dont think he would be good enough for the championship anyway, and Danny could probably bring someone in for £100,000 who would do a better job anyway
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #114 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 18:03:19 » |
|
I wouldn't jeopardise the shape of a side having a good season for £100,000.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #115 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 18:10:53 » |
|
Would be a real shame if he goes. After the loyalty we have shown him with a 3-year deal and getting hi career back on track here as well as offering him a very lucrative new deal I think it would smack of greed if he went. I guess that's football these days though. Out of contract or not though 100k is a joke. Barnard has 17 goals this season (3 more than Paynter) and went for 200k. If I was Fitton and Wilson it would be double your money or no move.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #116 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 18:13:32 » |
|
Take the money and run is my opinion.
Hes having a good season atm, but i fear he is a one season wonder (ie like Ricketts of Bolton before he played for England). His goal scoring record to date is one goal every 4 and a half matches. Not prolific by any means
Dont think he would be good enough for the championship anyway, and Danny could probably bring someone in for £100,000 who would do a better job anyway
Again referring to Crawley, they want 100k for a striker who has 8 career goals! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dphunt88
Offline
Posts: 461
|
|
« Reply #117 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 18:15:02 » |
|
Being a Paynter fan, I feel i should step in here!
Paynter in all competitions 96 (+20) with 36 goals. So...
that's a goal every 2.66 starts or a goal every 3.22 appearances.
Which compares quite well with Rory Fallon, one of our better recent ex target men... 51 (+38) with 25 goals.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Enthusiastic Loathed Strangers Podcast contributor.
Co-founder of "The Spirit of 69" fan action group.
Ernie Hunt's second cousin.
Overweight local cricket all-rounder!
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33886
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #118 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 18:20:51 » |
|
Take the money and run is my opinion.
Hes having a good season atm, but i fear he is a one season wonder
Were you in a coma all of last season? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
 Online
Posts: 12832
|
|
« Reply #119 on: Monday, January 25, 2010, 18:23:22 » |
|
Nah, he was following Christian Roberts around and telling him he is shit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
