|
|
Chubbs
 Offline
Posts: 10517
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 08:59:17 » |
|
get it done fitton!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 09:11:47 » |
|
I imagine the "We might teach him bad habits - like goal-scoring.” comment won't help our chances very much  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 09:20:33 » |
|
The problem with the idea of a return to the club is it would be seen as a failure by West Brom and by Cox...a very public admission that, even though it's very early days, things are not panning out as they had hoped.
I feel sorry for him. He is suffering the consequences of having joined a very good club. Maybe a club somewhat lower down the Championship pecking order would have suited him better. Reading, for example - a move back there could have worked really well for him, for a lot of reasons. At the back of his mind, I'm sure he's also now considering the implications of what may happen if West Brom are promoted at the end of this season. If they are - and it's looking a distinct possibility - it becomes even harder to see any sort of future for him there.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 09:39:32 » |
|
I think that the fact he might be going to Watford on loan is what might be angering Fitton. Fitton said on Tuesday night that it would be a very long time before they deal with Watford after what happened with Theo Robinson over the summer.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 09:44:26 » |
|
It would be good to see how Cox's impact on a team which is doing well
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic
Offline
Posts: 4156
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 09:46:11 » |
|
I think that the fact he might be going to Watford on loan is what might be angering Fitton. Fitton said on Tuesday night that it would be a very long time before they deal with Watford after what happened with Theo Robinson over the summer.
Completely irrelevant. We sold Cox, we have no say in his future. Watford aren't in our league. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 09:52:55 » |
|
If Fitton can't stand the sight of the people at Watford he would need to deal with (purely speculation, of course) then I think it makes it very relevant.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 10:17:45 » |
|
If Fitton can't stand the sight of the people at Watford he would need to deal with (purely speculation, of course) then I think it makes it very relevant.
Maybe I'm missing something here, but if West Brom are proposing to loan Cox to Watford, then any contact is between West Brom and Watford. If we want to propose him coming back here as an alternative, surely we do that by talking to West Brom, not Watford? So why would Fitton need to deal with Watford at all? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chubbs
Offline
Posts: 10517
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 10:29:16 » |
|
Maybe I'm missing something here, but if West Brom are proposing to loan Cox to Watford, then any contact is between West Brom and Watford. If we want to propose him coming back here as an alternative, surely we do that by talking to West Brom, not Watford? So why would Fitton need to deal with Watford at all?
I think he's just saying he would prefer he went somewhere other than watford, im sure he i aware theres nothing he can do about it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Phil_S
Offline
Posts: 1534
Who changed my Avatar ?!
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 10:38:51 » |
|
I think he has done what he can by talking to Cox direct. Coxy will know he can come back & if he wants too will no doubt get on to his Manager about it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the Dark Side
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 11:01:58 » |
|
I think he's just saying he would prefer he went somewhere other than watford, im sure he i aware theres nothing he can do about it.
I was responding to Ardiles, not Fitton. I don't think Fitton's suggested anything of the sort. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 11:53:05 » |
|
I think it's important to remember that Cox wasn't really signed by Roberto Di Matteo but by their chairman.
It's all well and good Di Matteo saying "yeah whatever sign him" but he cannot be too keen on him because he tends to pick the other sub striker over him, unless Cox has been sulking behind the scenes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 12:07:26 » |
|
Pah, I'd rather start Charlie Austin than Cox.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mplanney
Offline
Posts: 182
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 12:12:00 » |
|
I tend to agree with what Fitton is saying regarding his playing position, in that it seems strange that if he's to go out on loan, they want the loan club to play him in a position that's not upfront, seems very odd to me unless they don't see him as having a future as a striker.
Considering the amount of goals he scores, that seems very strange, also seems a bit odd his parent club insisting where he plays. (that's the way i read it anyway)
Maybe this is common unsure, if this is the case, maybe Bolton are saying play Tope on the wing, I see no other reason for it cos he's crap there.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
