|
glos_robin
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 14:30:26 » |
|
So is that the FA cup first round he'll miss as well then?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
 Offline
Posts: 33890
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 14:32:18 » |
|
no idea, although the less league games he misses the better in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DerbyRed
Offline
Posts: 455
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 14:34:47 » |
|
He misses Hartlepool (h), Norwich (a), Tranmere (a) and FA Cup 1st round.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
glos_robin
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 14:35:23 » |
|
To be honest with the number of mistakes being made by refs at the moment like the City v Palace game, they were never going to overturn it as it would just add to the long list of big mistakes made by useless officials. Why let justice get in the way of the league protecting referees (and linesmen) that aren't up to the job.
I doubt they even bothered to review the incident and just read the paperwork and slapped an extra game on the ban.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 14:35:47 » |
|
How the fuck could it be rejected so quickly?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RJack
Offline
Posts: 1450
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 14:39:15 » |
|
Yep he'll now miss Hartlepool Home, Tranmere Away, Norwich JPT & FA Cup 1st round Absolute joke of a decision if you ask me. Just goes to show you the FA only seem to make an example of the smaller clubs. Bet if we were Manchester United, Chelsea, Liverpool etc he would have been cleared. On another note if Millwall fans want to lynch Manks on the visit to The New Den i reckon we should start our own for Jimmy Abpoo  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 14:40:50 by RJack »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 14:45:55 » |
|
what the fuck
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ibelieveinmrreeves
Should've gone to Specsavers
Offline
Posts: 3857
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 14:55:36 » |
|
Thats fucking abysmal.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Even men with steel hearts love to see a dog on the pitch.
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27180
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 15:02:28 » |
|
Shocking.
Like glos_robin said, I bet they didn't even view the video evidence - just re-read the ref's report and did away with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Power to people
Offline
Posts: 6583
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 15:03:13 » |
|
Not seen the incident, but it is a poor decision to upgrade it from 3 matches to 4 when it is his first red card or ban of the season
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 15:06:48 » |
|
Not seen the incident, but it is a poor decision to upgrade it from 3 matches to 4 when it is his first red card or ban of the season
I don't think past form has got anything to do with it. If they think you're taking the piss with the appeal and wasting their time then they increase the ban - its meant to be a deterrent to making dodgy appeals. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 15:10:22 » |
|
As per Nemo, not in the least surprised, could have told you this on Saturday straight after the game: Because they never rescind them if there's been contact (which there was, not necessarily malicious but there was contact) and you run the risk of getting any ban increased. Not worth it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC Bart
Offline
Posts: 1114
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 15:12:12 » |
|
But we wernt taking the piss- it was a genuine appeal.
Would like to see Easton back- do not rate Timlin at all
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mexicano Rojo
Offline
Posts: 11953
Demasiado no es demasiado
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 15:13:03 » |
|
i agree bart, timlin has under performed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Barry Scott
Offline
Posts: 9134
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 15:15:45 » |
|
What an absolutely fucking scandalous load of bollocks. I'm fucking seething. Can we email someone? Not find out why (it'd be like cracking a joke around the personality vacuum that is the modern pig/cop) because a bit of email bombing wouldn't be a bad idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
