|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12871
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 14:27:00 » |
|
Good little interview on there. He seems very nervous.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27183
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 14:32:55 » |
|
That's because he's heard all about you John.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12871
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 15:48:38 » |
|
Fuck off fatty. Or I'll shag your sister again.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27183
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 16:25:27 » |
|
Be my guest.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12871
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 16:15:51 » |
|
Do I have to ask her as well, or is that a done deal now?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27183
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 16:46:18 » |
|
Well if you don't ask her then technically it's rape. So yeah, you better had.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Riddick
Offline
Posts: 2947
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 16:52:46 » |
|
according to the last line of this O'Brien actually cost us money and was not a free transfer!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants
Offline
Posts: 8819
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 16:54:07 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 17:21:05 » |
|
What the fuck is Fitton talking about?
He says that O'Brien was released by Hibs, then he suggests that a fee may have been paid.
Seems he was under contract, so if we paid a fee then Hibs sold him and if we didn't then Hibs released him.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
Offline
Posts: 23844
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 18:50:16 » |
|
He's under 24, so they have to pay a development fee or go to tribunal, no?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27183
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 18:51:52 » |
|
Only if Hibs offered him a new deal, equal to or better than what he was on.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16144
We'll never die!
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 18:53:29 » |
|
From what Fitton said, it sounds like we may have offered a fee to take him off their hands - rather than arsing about with a tribunal
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36347
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 19:40:13 » |
|
He had a year left so we must have compensated Hibs with some money to settle the contract.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
spider
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 21:10:19 » |
|
He had a year left on his contract but wasnt in the managers plans so he left by mutual consent. No fee involved.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|