Spencer_White
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 20:05:37 » |
|
you supported spurs 3 seasons ago?!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 22:07:51 » |
|
the FA should hang their heads in shame at England games not being free to air
Live coverage of England games being on pay channels is fine with me, but the highlights have to be free to air. Setanta really fucked up with that England game by not sorting something out, I know they did at the last second (literally) but the damage had been done. Not sure that Setanta will ever recover from the bad PR they got as a result, which they fully deserve.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Doore
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 22:16:22 » |
|
Live coverage of England games being on pay channels is fine with me, but the highlights have to be free to air.
Setanta really fucked up with that England game by not sorting something out, I know they did at the last second (literally) but the damage had been done. Not sure that Setanta will ever recover from the bad PR they got as a result, which they fully deserve.
Completely agree - well said.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 22:17:50 » |
|
I get free Setanta with Virgin
See, now if they'd done that the other way round, they might have got more subscribers
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Doore
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 22:19:27 » |
|
See, now if they'd done that the other way round, they might have got more subscribers
I'm not one to burst with laughter often, but that made beer come out of my nose. You have ruined my keyboard with your clever word play.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 06:50:52 » |
|
what was the england game a while ago when the crowd were all chanting "we hate setanta" every time the cameras went on them ?
Andorra in Barcelona, twas a fun evening. We also did 'BBC, BBC, BBC'
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 18:22:24 » |
|
Live coverage of England games being on pay channels is fine with me, but the highlights have to be free to air.
Setanta really fucked up with that England game by not sorting something out, I know they did at the last second (literally) but the damage had been done. Not sure that Setanta will ever recover from the bad PR they got as a result, which they fully deserve.
Correct. That was Croatia. BBC, ITV and C5 were interested and they didnt cut a deal. Over valued the highlights. Very naughty.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 22:26:11 » |
|
Looks like they could be saved.
|
|
|
Logged
|
/ W56196272
|
|
|
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
Offline
Posts: 9054
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 22:40:04 » |
|
Andorra in Barcelona, twas a fun evening. We also did 'BBC, BBC, BBC'
The first time round it wasn't, the most cold I have ever been I think, was horrible. 11 of us from a ski resort freezing our tits of in Barca, not what we expected...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57770
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: Friday, June 12, 2009, 07:01:41 » |
|
Looks like they could be saved.
Maybe, but surely the UK arm is ultimately finished in its current form.They are a loss making venture and their product will be weaker from 2010 when they lose a Prem rights package. If saved, my guess is they will renegotiate and see out what commitments they have. Stiff their current shareholders. Offload/let expire their expensive contracts and switch to niche markets - euro football, UFC and the like. They'll have far few subscribers at a presumably cheaper price, but far less expense too.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Power to people
Offline
Posts: 6583
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: Friday, June 12, 2009, 07:30:51 » |
|
Maybe, but surely the UK arm is ultimately finished in its current form.They are a loss making venture and their product will be weaker from 2010 when they lose a Prem rights package.
If saved, my guess is they will renegotiate and see out what commitments they have. Stiff their current shareholders. Offload/let expire their expensive contracts and switch to niche markets - euro football, UFC and the like. They'll have far few subscribers at a presumably cheaper price, but far less expense too.
I'm nto sure they can continue though, the whole point of a channel like that is to get subscribers and they don't get them and when they lose the footy (or most of it) then people will cancel, so even if they get niche sport then they are not going to get many subscribers
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57770
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: Friday, June 12, 2009, 07:46:53 » |
|
Less subscribers at a lower price and massively reduced costs may be profitable enough, particularly if most of their debt gets wiped in the deal.
I guess they could partner with another broadcaster, but Setantas current worth to another broadcaster must be limited.
Or I guess they may think they can increase their userbase with what they have. But I just can't see it.
As Pauls says, contract renegotiation will no doubt hit the small clubs :-|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spy
Offline
Posts: 2483
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: Friday, June 12, 2009, 09:54:29 » |
|
I'm nto sure they can continue though, the whole point of a channel like that is to get subscribers and they don't get them and when they lose the footy (or most of it) then people will cancel, so even if they get niche sport then they are not going to get many subscribers
Yes I agree, I would suspect any subscriiption sport channel in this country couldn't survive without any significant football.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57770
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: Friday, June 19, 2009, 09:51:29 » |
|
People are sure they will secure the cash for this payment.
Question is how do they continue in the current form? The are loss making and will lose some EPL rights in 2010.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|