|
A Gent Orange
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 09:34:34 » |
|
It is a long list of grounds that will gradually get cut down to ten or eight. I can't remember which but it probably isn't going to be MK.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 09:42:03 » |
|
That's a strange list. Milton Keynes shouldn't be anywhere near it, for more reasons than I have time to list here. And Pompey?!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LucienSanchez
Offline
Posts: 5194
Is this hospital called St. Croc of Shit?!
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 09:43:59 » |
|
If Mexico or the USA get to hold it ahead of us, i'll be annoyed. I can't believe we haven't hosted it again since '66.
|
|
|
Logged
|
We made a promise we swore we'd always remember... no retreat, baby, no surrender
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 10:03:44 » |
|
If we host in 2018, it will 52 years since 1966 and the 13th World Cup since then. I know there are plenty of factors involved, but given that England has less than 1% of the world's population, we would be doing fairly well to get the World Cup back again so soon.
Slightly off topic here, but when Atlanta was awarded the 1996 Summer Olympics, I was stunned that it would return to the US just 12 years after the Los Angeles Games. Even for a country of 300 million people, you shouldn't really have the event returning there more often than once every 40 years or so.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15616
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 10:18:06 » |
|
Its obviously all to do with stadium locations etc.
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
juddie
Offline
Posts: 2978
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 10:25:28 » |
|
anyone going to SA next year?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Phil_S
Offline
Posts: 1534
Who changed my Avatar ?!
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 10:44:57 » |
|
That's a strange list. Milton Keynes shouldn't be anywhere near it, for more reasons than I have time to list here. And Pompey?!
Pompeys main stand is made of old railway sleepers & is not much bigger & definitely older than ours. Unless they are going to have a new ground by then there is no way it could host a world cup game
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the Dark Side
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 10:56:10 » |
|
I was reading a paper yesterday that Pompey are still planning a new ground, despite not having no meney !!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 10:58:52 » |
|
Slightly off topic here, but when Atlanta was awarded the 1996 Summer Olympics, I was stunned that it would return to the US just 12 years after the Los Angeles Games. Even for a country of 300 million people, you shouldn't really have the event returning there more often than once every 40 years or so.
Of course, Chicago are bidding to host the 2016 Olympics, and trying to use the Obama factor to help get it. If they win, the US would have had 3 summer Olympics in less that 40 years, and they've also had a Winter one in Salt Lake City also.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 12:17:49 » |
|
I hope we DONT win.
Would save the country a load of money on stadiums we dont need.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Power to people
Offline
Posts: 6588
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 12:24:49 » |
|
We have no chance of hosting 2018 - we're not prepared to give kick backs to fifa delegates in return for their vote - most if not all of fifa is corrupt
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 13:46:29 » |
|
Would save the country a load of money on stadiums we dont need.
The stadia is already built (Wembley, Emirates, Old Trafford, etc.) so it won't cost anyway near what the Olympics will.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 18:04:30 » |
|
The stadia is already built (Wembley, Emirates, Old Trafford, etc.) so it won't cost anyway near what the Olympics will.
You say that, but look at the draft names on the list? Do Bristol, Hull and Portsmouth really need 40,000 seater stadiums? Just creating white elephants for the future. Leicester's would also need upgrading. Do Nottingham Forest really need a new ground? Im also upset because I thought Anfield was saved with the inability of the Yanks to get more finance. From what I understand this bid seems obsessed with building all new stadia. It gets more rediculous every time we fail to host it. The FA seem to be so desperate for it they feel they have to blow everyone else out of the water with mega bucks. We dont need new stadiums, we need to reign in people like Richard Scudamore who make other associations hate us.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
4D
That was definately my last game, honest
Offline
Posts: 23530
I can't bear it 🙄
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: Monday, May 18, 2009, 19:55:55 » |
|
anyone going to SA next year?
St Albans? What's going on there?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|