STFC Bart
 Offline
Posts: 1114
|
 |
« on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:36:17 » |
|
Could be that the prospective new managers have been told that they have to work with Byrne and cannot bring in their own people. This will be a major stumbling block for many good managers who would all want to bring in their own backroom teams.
You would have thought Fitton would have learnt from the last time, as ineffective as Malpas was he should have been afforded the luxury of bringin in his own staff
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
 Online
Posts: 23569
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:37:58 » |
|
Welcome back Bart.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:38:09 » |
|
Hello Bart.
I'd say it was about getting the right man in and wanting to talk to as many people has possible, this co-inciding with the fact that he is a businessman with things to do and Wray has also been away from the game.
My glass is half-full in this pursuit... You can't bring in the best if they can't bring in their own team. I don't think Byrne is the issue... Williams certainly won't be!
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:40:15 by Rich Pullen »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC Bart
Offline
Posts: 1114
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:38:46 » |
|
You gonna argue with it then? I havent said it is the case just that it is apossible stumbling block. Challenge you to disagree
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
spacey
Offline
Posts: 2706
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:39:55 » |
|
I disagree. How'd you like them apples?!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nochee
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:43:05 » |
|
If this is the case then Fitton must be going thru the same list that we have. Ticking off everyone until someone agrees to have Byrne as a right hand bitch.
I truly hope not!! If that is the case, then we have lost some great potential.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:45:58 by nochee »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 15067
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:46:19 » |
|
Once again Brat, I think you have got it 100% bang on the money.
Well done.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:47:39 » |
|
Could be that the prospective new managers have been told that they have to work with Byrne and cannot bring in their own people. This will be a major stumbling block for many good managers who would all want to bring in their own backroom teams.
You would have thought Fitton would have learnt from the last time, as ineffective as Malpas was he should have been afforded the luxury of bringin in his own staff
It's a fair point, but as you say I would hope that Fitton would give the option of a new man bringing his own team, if the packages were reasonable and the potential benefits were clear to see. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33879
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:48:06 » |
|
Why would Fitton continue to be loyal to Byrne of all people?
Why would keeping Byrne (1 person) mean that the new manager couldnt bring in any back room staff?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:48:45 » |
|
The majorly critical flaw that we have, is that we don't know the list of candidates... We can pretend that we know, but alas we don't.
Fitton has ensured that no fucker has a clue, we've thrown countless names at him and they've been dismissed - whether it's a bluff or not we don't know. Ward and Holloway were obvious local candidates, but the others? They could literally be anyone.
I don't operate on a system of assuming that there's always a problem at Swindon - given our history it's sometimes forgivable to fear the worse, but I think people are just getting impatient (myself included).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bushey Boy
Offline
Posts: 8351
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:56:19 » |
|
I believe Bart is completely correct. Its why Ling wouldnt come before.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 15067
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:57:05 » |
|
but the others? They could literally be anyone.
Meh! I think that's going a bit far. I think it's fair to say that it won't be, for example(...pulling a name out of thin air totally at random...) Larry David. Actually..I think I'll put a tenner on him with VC just for the hell of it. That should see him safely installed as the new favourite. I can see the headline on the back of tomorrow's Adver now  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33879
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:57:28 » |
|
Is it?
Ling didnt come here because we didnt offer him a job as far as I remember.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:58:45 » |
|
I believe Bart is completely correct. Its why Ling wouldnt come before.
On the basis of what? It's all rumour! We don't know nothing. It could be right, it could be wrong. Bart has constructed a fair argument and his point is valid, but at the end of the proverbial, it's a mere rumour. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rustle
Prediction League Champion 2012/13
Offline
Posts: 1393
TEF World Cup Stunners Champion 2010
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:59:48 » |
|
I dont get this why is it taking time lark,I thought Mr Fitton said from the outset that it would take time because he want's to get things right this time,He said it will be before the crewe game,he also mentioned two people are in employment,so i would expect some kind of compensation has to be agreed,and also he stated the formal Interviews dont start until tomorrow.
So i expect he has had other thing's to deal with this week like his other business etc,I dont think anyone can read into it being about having to work with Byrne.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
