Don Rogers Shop
|
 |
« Reply #285 on: Thursday, November 20, 2008, 23:04:28 » |
|
Hmm stfcdave
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mexicano Rojo
Offline
Posts: 11953
Demasiado no es demasiado
|
 |
« Reply #286 on: Thursday, November 20, 2008, 23:22:55 » |
|
Just been for my nightly run around the beach and our local bnp resident downstairs windows have been put through and are now boarded up!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic
Offline
Posts: 4156
|
 |
« Reply #287 on: Friday, November 21, 2008, 08:40:25 » |
|
Just been for my nightly run around the beach and our local bnp resident downstairs windows have been put through and are now boarded up!
Lucky it's a pebbly beach eh Mex ? sand wouldn't have so much effect
|
|
|
Logged
|
Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
|
|
|
sheepshagger
Suburban Capitalist........
Offline
Posts: 920
|
 |
« Reply #288 on: Friday, November 21, 2008, 09:15:08 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Wise men say........
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #289 on: Friday, November 21, 2008, 09:27:24 » |
|
[url width=226 height=170]http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/45219000/jpg/_45219142_griffin_pa226b.jpg[/url] ARRRGGGHHHHH
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Online
Posts: 26752
|
 |
« Reply #290 on: Friday, November 21, 2008, 09:31:36 » |
|
funnily enough ben i was going to post that picture up.
chinner!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
 |
« Reply #291 on: Friday, November 21, 2008, 10:16:54 » |
|
As Ironside STILL hasn't answered my question about the rank hypocrisy of Nick Griffin invoking the Human Rights Act he wants to repeal because "it's only used to protect foreign criminals" over this, thought this subtle reminder from the Times might jog his memory. So, for the fourth time, do you still think the Human Rights Act should be repealed then? Or is this not an excellent example of why it is important to have Human Rights enshrined in British law, applicable equally to everyone, no matter how scummy?
[url width=385 height=295]http://www.timesonline.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00436/brookes1_436318a.jpg[/url]
And still no answer from Ironside? Not keen on the difficult questions are you? While you're not answering this one, maybe you could let us know whether you agree with Nick Griffin that the Holocaust was a hoax made up by the Allies and the "international Jewish conspiracy" to discredit those nice Nazi chaps? Or with his leading crony Mark Collett's sanguine assessment that "Churchill was a fucking cunt who led us into a pointless war with other whites [i.e. The Nazis] standing up for their race"?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
 |
« Reply #292 on: Friday, November 21, 2008, 10:32:58 » |
|
Interestingly (and I know I'm going off topic a little here) there was more support for appeasing the Hitler and the Nazi Party in the mid/late 1930s than many people appreciate today. Appeasement is usually associated simply with Chamberlain, but he was not a lone voice. Lord Halifax was another supporter, as was Edward VIII...and many ordinary people alive at the time.
A common attitude back then was 'Let Mr Hitler have his European territories and we'll have our Empire.' The wholesale vilification of the Nazis only developed during and, in particular, after World War Two, when the full horror of the atrocities they perpetrated became apparent.
Churchill's defiance in May 1940, when he decided to take Germany on, was not a simple reflection of the national mood. He could easily have made peace at that time. His foresight was spectacularly impressive.
|
|
« Last Edit: Friday, November 21, 2008, 10:38:01 by Ardiles »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
horlock07
Offline
Posts: 19147
Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost
|
 |
« Reply #293 on: Friday, November 21, 2008, 13:12:46 » |
|
Interestingly (and I know I'm going off topic a little here) there was more support for appeasing the Hitler and the Nazi Party in the mid/late 1930s than many people appreciate today. Appeasement is usually associated simply with Chamberlain, but he was not a lone voice. Lord Halifax was another supporter, as was Edward VIII...and many ordinary people alive at the time.
A common attitude back then was 'Let Mr Hitler have his European territories and we'll have our Empire.' The wholesale vilification of the Nazis only developed during and, in particular, after World War Two, when the full horror of the atrocities they perpetrated became apparent.
Churchill's defiance in May 1940, when he decided to take Germany on, was not a simple reflection of the national mood. He could easily have made peace at that time. His foresight was spectacularly impressive.
Equally again and I don't know a great deal about this - wasn't much of the fuss about Ross and Brand stirred up by the Daily Mail. Wasn't this due in some part due to Brand being aware that the Mail were about to splash the story after it happened and thus in his apology on the radio show mentioning something about the Mail's appeasenment/supporting position in relation Hitler in the 30's - this may be bollocks I was pissed when they mentioned it on the radio!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
 |
« Reply #295 on: Friday, November 21, 2008, 13:44:21 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
A Gent Orange
|
 |
« Reply #296 on: Friday, November 21, 2008, 14:10:54 » |
|
Actually that is a good point. The list of BNP members is so dull compared to the assorted toffs and nutjobs in the British Union of Fascists and other associated organisations. In between them they: invented the searchlight, wrote books on yoga, formed their own British SS, hung around with occultist and mountaineer Alistair Crowley and happened to be the 12th Duke of Bedford.
And that is without mentioning Mosley, William Joyce or the Mittfords.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ron dodgers
Offline
Posts: 2742
shaddap your face
|
 |
« Reply #297 on: Friday, November 21, 2008, 20:27:24 » |
|
the BNP will never be mainstream - the closest you'll get to it is the old school Tories. We are so much a multicultural society that there is now no turning back. I am in fact an original Neanderthal and all you Homo Sapiens can just fuck off and leave us alone. Britain is Neanderthal - Saps OUT!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12832
|
 |
« Reply #298 on: Saturday, November 22, 2008, 10:24:57 » |
|
This has been my favourite ever thread on TEF.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« Reply #299 on: Saturday, November 22, 2008, 11:09:50 » |
|
All these groups are immigrants to the Britain Isles (the land mass) as the first lot here were the Neolithic Britons and they were driven out by the Celts (from northern Europe, I believe). Therefore none of these groups can be described as indigenous British. Every one of us here in the British Isles is an immigrant.
Not strictly true....the recentish case of Cheddar Man shed some interesting light. A skeleton dated to about 9000 years ago found in a Cheddar cave, puts the person into Mesolitic hunter gathering time. The date is obtained by analysis of dental DNA....the researchers then did DNA analysis in Cheddar's present population and found 2 inhabitants with an exact match. In the late Palaeolithic/ early Mesolithic, the land bridge between England and the continent would have still been intact....this is today the North Sea, large numbers of Mesolithic hand axes etc come up in fishing nets as the North Sea is remarkably shallow. It looks like when the last Ice Age was in place to the north of roughly the midlands, there was a fair population of hunter gatherers, these would be considered the indiginous population, and teh Cheddar research suggests their descendants still remain.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|