Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: howard not offered a contract!  (Read 4680 times)
red macca

« Reply #15 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 14:04:56 »

Quote from: "dazzza"
Strange one that as he was in the press himself saying that the deal he had been offered was not acceptable as he wanted two years rather than one.

Shame to lose a gifted player but he hasn't been consistant enough and if we manage to secure the services of Shakes and Holmes (perhaps a snippet of hope there) then he would be bench material again.
could just be his arrogance on display again assuming he will get a contract.these players under 24 do we get any compensation?
Logged
Dazzza

Offline Offline

Posts: 8265



WWW
« Reply #16 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 14:18:55 »

Only if we have offered a contract!
Logged

red macca

« Reply #17 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 14:59:47 »

Quote from: "dazzza"
Only if we have offered a contract!
which we have done apart from howard then...sorry to ask but does the compensation depend on ability or something else
Logged
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.

Offline Offline

Posts: 9043





Ignore
« Reply #18 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 15:11:46 »

Quote from: "deanored"
Quote from: "dazzza"
Only if we have offered a contract!
which we have done apart from howard then...sorry to ask but does the compensation depend on ability or something else


It should reflect his worth to us really, Sol Davis went for about £120,000 under tribunal in the end I think, so I would imagine if any compensation were due we would get 50 - 75,000.  I'd be happy with that. Soapy Tit Wank
Logged
Piemonte

« Reply #19 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 15:15:37 »

Is that in pence Tom?
Logged
red macca

« Reply #20 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 15:16:16 »

Quote from: "Kinky Tom"
Quote from: "deanored"
Quote from: "dazzza"
Only if we have offered a contract!
which we have done apart from howard then...sorry to ask but does the compensation depend on ability or something else


It should reflect his worth to us really, Sol Davis went for about £120,000 under tribunal in the end I think, so I would imagine if any compensation were due we would get 50 - 75,000.  I'd be happy with that. Soapy Tit Wank
could be more ,rhys evans got a good reputation some reason as sammy igoe,howards sub role not much compo i feel,duke lets leave that one,and smith surely has proved he is valuable so bring on the compo... Cheesy  Cheesy  happy days
Logged
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.

Offline Offline

Posts: 9043





Ignore
« Reply #21 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 15:17:53 »

Cheesy  I give that figure because the likelyhood of it going to a tribunal for anything less seems unlikely, £50,000 really should be the market value for a young midfielder at our level.
Logged
Piemonte

« Reply #22 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 15:20:03 »

even if he's a fat twat?
Logged
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.

Offline Offline

Posts: 9043





Ignore
« Reply #23 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 15:24:21 »

Even if he is a fat twat, yes.  If Swansea were to sell Trundle they'd probably get £150,000 - he's fatter.  Brolin cost a few mil, and he was even fatter.  Bobby Howe was fatter than them all and he cost us about 70,000 (?).

You have to take into account that the lardarse does actually have talent, it just happens to be incased by a few pies.
Logged
Piemonte

« Reply #24 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 15:27:23 »

Cheesy  Cheesy
Logged
Barry Potter

« Reply #25 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 15:36:52 »

Isn't the compensation dependant on how many years a player has been at the club "developing".? Sol Davis was with us for many years and from a young age, Howard only rolled up last year so doesn't seem likely we'll get much, if anything.
Logged
reeves4england

Offline Offline

Posts: 16119


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #26 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 16:10:44 »

Quote
howard not offered a contract!
Oops

I think we could do with keeping him with the desperate situation we are in, especially if Smithy leaves. Although if he is on a big contract it sprobably better to save money.
Logged
alex

« Reply #27 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 16:27:25 »

this is a great money saver: not only do the club save money that would otherwise be spent on howard's wages, they no longer have to order in mcdonalds happy meals at half time nor do they have to order any extra extra large shirts from the kit supplier.

i think howard brought this upon himself - he clearly wants to play centre mid but his best postion and the position he had the most success in at swindon was left winger. if he wants to play centre mid, then let him go to another club, theres no point in hanging on to him, as like last season, there will be no space for him in the team in this coming season.

its gonna cost though to remove the golden plaque with his name on it that is currently glued to the substitutes bench
Logged
DMR

« Reply #28 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 20:42:11 »

**Prepares for a massive slating**

An in-form, fit and focused Hpward would be twice as valuable to us next season than Grant Smith, in my humble opinion.

Sorry!
Logged
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33875


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #29 on: Friday, May 13, 2005, 22:10:34 »

Quote from: "dave_m_russell"
**Prepares for a massive slating**

An in-form, fit and focused Hpward would be twice as valuable to us next season than Grant Smith, in my humble opinion.

Sorry!


An in-form, fit and focused Howard would be valuable to us next season, yes

twice as valuable as Grant Smith, no
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
Print
Jump to: