Arriba
 Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« on: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 23:27:54 » |
|
should be banned for a season in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 23:32:04 » |
|
what did he do?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33908
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 23:32:47 » |
|
he kicked out at someone...red card sure, but not a dangerous tackle because he was never going to clamp down on the leg/foot/ankle and do any damage...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 23:34:17 » |
|
two deliberate nasty tackles that could have broke legs
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33908
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 23:42:35 » |
|
it would have had to have been some kick to break a leg!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 23:46:17 » |
|
blatant assault dv with intent
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JPC82
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Sunday, September 14, 2008, 06:46:29 » |
|
when u see how little impact was needed to break Djibril cisse leg and henrik larssons leg u cant go round doing what guthrie did
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
michael
The Dude Abides
Offline
Posts: 3237
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Sunday, September 14, 2008, 07:18:50 » |
|
West Brom v West Ham: First ever EPL game with no shirt sponsors on display.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
michael
The Dude Abides
Offline
Posts: 3237
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Sunday, September 14, 2008, 07:26:02 » |
|
West Ham have obscured the name of their sponsor's logo. If they had Lotto kits instead of Umbro then all they'd have to do is wash them to get rid of it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lash_sumthin
Offline
Posts: 466
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Sunday, September 14, 2008, 07:53:45 » |
|
talking of sponsorship why are kingswood still all over the match day tickets?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
 Online
Posts: 23630
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Sunday, September 14, 2008, 09:33:37 » |
|
They've got something like 50,000 of last years ticket stubs to use up before they can move onto the new ones if its anything like last season, where we were with Nationwide tickets till about January.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
michael
The Dude Abides
Offline
Posts: 3237
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Sunday, September 14, 2008, 10:59:02 » |
|
50,000 leftover?!
Bit optimistic whoever put that order in no?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Sunday, September 14, 2008, 12:26:59 » |
|
West Ham have obscured the name of their sponsor's logo. If they had Lotto kits instead of Umbro then all they'd have to do is wash them to get rid of it.
why did we continue playing with a defunct sponsor on our shirts last season when as you say it would wash off so easily? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
Online
Posts: 23630
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Sunday, September 14, 2008, 12:36:30 » |
|
Because it'd wash off the website and probably logo at the same time, and we'd just look poor?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Sunday, September 14, 2008, 12:40:22 » |
|
it was a joke.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
