Ralphy
 Offline
Posts: 14189
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 11:45:04 » |
|
i don't think there is anything unnatural about homosexuality - after all, how do you define what is natural?
My mate's brother is gay and I personally have no problem whatsover with them. He's a good laugh to have a beer with. I suspose you could say it's unnatural because gays can't reproduce. Man and woman were put here so the human race can live on. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #61 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 11:50:19 » |
|
My mate's brother is gay and I personally have no problem whatsover with them. He's a good laugh to have a beer with.
I suspose you could say it's unnatural because gays can't reproduce. Man and woman were put here so the human race can live on.
Who put us here Ralphy? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dell boy
|
|
« Reply #62 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 11:50:28 » |
|
My mate's brother is gay and I personally have no problem whatsover with them. He's a good laugh to have a beer with.
I suspose you could say it's unnatural because gays can't reproduce. Man and woman were put here so the human race can live on.
Maybe in Biblical times, certainly not these days. Man is a second-rate being and does as he is told by the woman who use to serve him.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14189
|
|
« Reply #63 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 11:54:33 » |
|
Who put us here Ralphy?
I'm not entirely sure Reg. We're all here for a reason though. I'm not sure what mine is but there you go. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Weasel
Offline
Posts: 685
|
|
« Reply #64 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 11:54:51 » |
|
i don't think there is anything unnatural about homosexuality - after all, how do you define what is natural?
So, where in nature do you find homosexuality? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_animalEverywhere it seems. Lots of boy swans apparently love boy swans. Lions, monkeys, giraffes, lizards.... they're all at it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14189
|
|
« Reply #65 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 11:56:27 » |
|
How would we all feel if the next James Bond was gay?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dell boy
|
|
« Reply #66 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 11:57:24 » |
|
How would we all feel if the next James Bond was gay?
Apparently 8% would be jumping for joy!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #67 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 11:57:47 » |
|
I'm not entirely sure Reg.
We're all here for a reason though. I'm not sure what mine is but there you go.
No doubt we have an urge to reproduce...I would say stronger in women than in men. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #68 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 11:59:45 » |
|
How would we all feel if the next James Bond was gay?
The actor or a major change to the character? The two are fairly different. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14189
|
|
« Reply #69 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 12:00:13 » |
|
You and me baby ain't nothing but mammal so lets do it like they do on the Discovery channel...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #70 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 12:06:41 » |
|
What about the next Doctor Who not being a time lord but a Gaylord (the actual character)?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14189
|
|
« Reply #71 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 12:11:44 » |
|
A gay James Bond would just not be right. The character I mean, not the actor.
A gay Doctor Who would be quite bizarre.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Foggy
Offline
Posts: 1948
Ketchup wanker
|
|
« Reply #72 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 12:15:25 » |
|
The bible said so.
It must be true then |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sad to say, i must be on my way
|
|
|
wheretherealredsare
Change me
Offline
Posts: 3106
|
|
« Reply #73 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 12:53:56 » |
|
Is gay abandon where they have live music at The Pipers Arms?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chalkies_shorts
|
|
« Reply #74 on: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 17:42:01 » |
|
I'm quite happy to be shot down in flames here but a bloke's dick belongs in one of three places only. In your hand, in your trousers or in a woman. Anywhere else is absolutely wrong. Your anus is built to let things out, not let things in. I don't care if I come across as a homophobe - its wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
